Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
All
Clear
reviews
Manufacturer details
- Driver Type: 10 mm LCP (Liquid Crystal Polymer) Dynamic Driver
- Impedance: 32 Ω
- Sensitivity: 108 dB
- Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 20 kHz
- Connector: 0.78 mm 2-Pin
- Cable: Detachable High-Quality Copper Cable
- Plug Options: 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
Select products
Juzear TBS 01
- Positioning: The entry-level model designed for affordability and simplicity.
- Description: Offers a clear, straightforward performance with a basic amplifier design and a smart noise reduction circuit that helps keep costs low. Compared to the rest of the lineup, it has fewer advanced features, making it best for small-room setups and buyers looking for a budget-friendly, easy-to-use solution.
Juzear 81T
- Positioning: A step-up product aimed at enthusiasts seeking improved build quality and performance.
- Description: Delivers enhanced signal processing with a tuned frequency response circuit that noticeably refines sound clarity. Compared to the entry-level model, it offers additional connectivity options and improved technical details.
Juzear Butterfly 61T
- Positioning: A mid-tier offering blending modern design with balanced performance.
- Description: Features circuit technology that refines sound precision and connectivity, providing a broader dynamic range than the lower models. Relative to others in the lineup, it strikes a balance between performance and cost.
Juzear Clear
- Positioning: A premium product built for audiophiles with a taste for advanced processing and clean sound.
- Description: Impresses with dual-mode amplification that improves transparency and speed, setting it apart from the lower and mid-range options. When compared to other models, its enhanced dynamics and refined technical features deliver professional-grade performance.
Juzear Flame
- Positioning: The flagship model focused on high-end performance and comprehensive functionality.
- Description: Stands out with groundbreaking component selection and an innovative heat management system that ensures superior output clarity and durability. Compared to the rest of the lineup, its superior connectivity and technical sophistication deliver the ultimate in performance capability.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
Used
Juzear
What if you spend more?
Product Strengths
- Premium build quality and materials with luxurious Nappa leather detailing and a cast aluminum yoke
- Comfortable for long listening sessions with soft earcups and a headband that provides even pressure distribution
- Excellent sound quality with 40mm carbon cone drivers delivering ultra-fast response, low distortion, and a clean, smooth sound signature
- Effective active noise cancellation (ANC) reduces low-frequency sounds and midrange chatter, with the Nappa leather providing a tighter seal
- Realistic soundstage scale with tight, well-defined imaging, with the sound feeling more live and in front of the listener
Product Considerations
- Multipoint pairing is not always seamless, and there might be occasional wind noise from the earcup due to software glitches, with wear detection being inconsistent and inaccurate
- Limited app customization with only bass and treble adjustments, lacking a fully customizable EQ
- Microphone pickup is good in quiet environments, but can be affected by heavy noise gating in noisy conditions, causing voice fade-in/out
- Some emphasis on bass response, which may not appeal to everyone
- There is concern about the Nappa leather being easily scratched
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the PX7 S2, the PX8 offers better sound quality with greater instrument separation and realism due to the carbon fiber drivers, and also features more premium materials
- While the PX8 active noise cancelling does well, Sony still has better mic pickup
- The PX8 provides a good alternative to the Airpods Max
- The PX8 stacks up among some of the best wireless headphones along with the Focal Bathys
Takeaway: The Px8 is a premium wireless headphone with outstanding build quality and sound performance, which is perfect for audiophiles seeking a luxurious listening experience. It combines comfort, effective noise cancellation, and detailed audio reproduction, making it a worthwhile investment for those prioritizing sound quality and high-end materials.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Lose yourself in your music with the first-ever headphones from Mark Levinson, a pioneer in high-fidelity audio for the past 50 years. Reference-quality sound meets luxurious comfort in a lightweight and durable set of headphones featuring Adaptive Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) that’s perfect for travel. Reveal the hidden details in your music – at home, on the go, or anywhere you find a moment to listen.
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Excellent sound quality with a balanced and refined signature, detailed mids, and smooth treble
- Effective active noise cancellation (ANC) and ambient aware mode
- Premium build quality with high-quality materials such as leather, anodized aluminum, and metallic paint
- Comfortable for long listening sessions due to soft leather ear cushions and a well-designed headband
- Comprehensive codec support (LDAC, aptX Adaptive, AAC) for high-resolution wireless audio
Product Considerations
- High price point, making them inaccessible for many consumers
- App is lacking in some features, such as fully customizable EQ and customizable ANC modes
- On-cup controls are described as basic and not very intuitive to use
- Some reviewers feel the design does not fully convey a sense of luxury for the price
- Occasional reports of issues with the 'on-head detection' feature—causing connection problems
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Focal Bathys: The Mark Levinson 5909 offers a cleaner and more natural tonality with a smoother, more consistent, and detailed treble response than the Focal Bathys
- Vs Apple AirPods Max: The Mark Levinson 5909 offers better sound quality, particularly in the bass frequencies, and is more comfortable than the AirPods Max
- Vs Bowers & Wilkins PX8: The Mark Levinson 5909 measures better in audio quality
Takeaway: The Mark Levinson № 5909 headphones offer excellent sound, comfort, and noise cancellation, making them a top-tier choice for those seeking a premium listening experience. With their high-end sound quality and comprehensive feature set, these headphones are a great option for audiophiles wanting the best wireless experience.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Unique octagonal design made of quality materials, with a rugged, serviceable build quality featuring exposed nuts and bolts.
- Surprising amount of bass for an open-back, on-ear headphone, that is solid, tangible, present, well balanced and well tuned.
- The silver-plated OCC copper cable is lightweight, pliable, ergonomic and does not remain bent after staying still.
- Comfortable on-ear headphone, especially considering it's an on-ear design, with thick, soft pads and a comfortable headband.
- Easy to drive with portable devices like dongles or smartphones.
Product Considerations
- Being an on-ear design, the Thalia can become uncomfortable after extended listening sessions (45 minutes or longer) due to pressure on the ears.
- Not the most compact headphone, and does not fold up, limiting its portability somewhat.
- The open-back design results in sound leakage, making it less suitable for noisy environments or situations where discretion is required.
- The height adjustment mechanism, while providing fine control, is a bit fiddly and not easily adjustable on the fly.
- Its lower-midrange will be too full for some.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- The Thalia is far superior to the Koss Porta Pro and sets a new standard for portable on-ear headphones, but it is inspired by the Porta Pro.
- Compared to the Grado RS2x, the Thalia is more durable, comfortable, and more enjoyable overall, and is more bassy and thicker in the midrange.
- The Thalia has a faster pace and a better driver control, and offers a lot more in the top-octave than the Sennheiser Momentum 2/3.
Takeaway: The Thalia is a uniquely designed, portable on-ear headphone that delivers great sound and is built to last. It is a good option for those who want a distinctive headphone that is fun to listen to.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Offers excellent midrange resolution, highlighting subtle details in instruments
- Features a safe yet exciting U-shaped tuning suitable for all genres
- Presents a dynamic and exciting sound signature, clear vocal performances, and a resolving staging performance
- The included cable is of high quality and features interchangeable plugs
- Has great audio reproduction accuracy and consistent audio delivery
Product Considerations
- The upper treble may be a little exaggerated for some listeners
- The shell is larger than average for a universal IEM, which may cause fit issues for some
- Stock ear tips are just okay
- Bass resolution could be better
- Does not have an integrated microphone, so a standalone mic is needed to take calls
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Monarch MKII: The MKIII has increased richness in its midrange and an upper treble exaggeration, offering a slightly U-shaped signature compared to the MkII's balanced profile
- Vs. Symphonium Helios: MkIII's midbass body contrasts Helios' dipped lower mids, MkIII has better overall resolution, but a more exaggerated treble
- Vs. 64 Audio U4s: The MkIII is better tuned compared to the U4s, with the U4s having a thicker midrange and weightier timbre
- Vs. MOONDROP x Crinacle DUSK: The THIEAUDIO have a more detailed treble range
- Vs. MOONDROP Blessing 3: The THIEAUDIO have a more elevated bass range
- Vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle ZERO: RED: The THIEAUDIO do a better job blocking out external noise and leak less audio
Takeaway: The Monarch MKIII is a well-tuned IEM that is great for all kinds of music and has excellent technical performance. If one is looking for a high-end IEM with a versatile sound, this could be a great choice.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Faceplate design is very beautiful using abalone, mimicking butterfly wings
- High-quality cable is soft, flexible, non-tangly, great sounding, and has a perfect weight and feel to it
- Impactful low-end, but not overbearing, sounds balanced and cohesive
- Overall sound is warm with excellent detail and bass, performing well with both competitive and immersive single player games
- Good passive noise isolation helps users focus on music
- Connectivity options are present
Product Considerations
- Shells are a little on the larger side, which may be an issue for those with smaller ears
- Nozzles are big and require manipulation to get tips on, plus may cause fit issues
- There is a bit of bass bleed or veiling in the lower mid-range, which can come at the cost of detail retrieval within the mid-range
- Highs can be a fraction too shouty, which can be taxing after a long listening session
- Seal dependent, a vacuum-like seal will result in less bass
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- DaVinci's tuning is better, upper mid-range and treble are simply beautiful, DaVinci renders vocals and instruments more naturally
- Studio 4 is tuned better, renders vocals and instruments more naturally, and is more detailed in the mid-range, treble, and upper treble
- The Pilgrim is tuned better, sounds more natural, and has better detail retrieval
- The Butterfly has a slightly smoother upper midrange, which makes vocals sound a little more enjoyable, and a little more refined and detailed treble
- The Butterfly either equals or bests the Performer 5 in almost every regard
Takeaway: The Butterfly 61T is a well-built IEM with beautiful aesthetics, a smooth and lively sound, and a great cable. It provides an excellent listening experience across various genres, and is a strong contender in the $200 price range.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Beautiful design with CNC-milled stabilized wood panels and silver trim.
- Good clarity, instrument separation, and detail in the midrange.
- The cable is soft, tangle-free, doesn’t have microphonics, and features interchangeable terminations.
- Comfortable and lightweight design.
- High-quality bass texture, mid-bass detail, and speed.
Product Considerations
- Bass presentation is more neutral and less focused on mid-bass with a less warm and rich presentation than some might prefer.
- Treble is more forward, which can come across as a little bright and potentially fatiguing.
- The eartips quality is disappointing.
- The soundstage could be wider.
- Bright, analytical, digital, or neutral bright sources may not be the best pairings.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Juzear Butterfly 61T, the Dragonfly 81T leans more bright with more treble energy, less lower mid and mid-bass energy for a cleaner sound.
- Vs Truthear Nova, the 8-1T is more like a Nova with a twist, it has the air and the sparkle up top.
Takeaway: The Juzear Dragonfly 81T IEM is a well-built, beautiful looking, and comfortable IEM with a balanced sound signature that emphasizes clarity and detail—making it great for long listening sessions, gaming, or for people who value precise imaging. If one likes a more neutral bass, good clarity, and air, this is a good choice.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- The sound signature is generally well-tuned and balanced, offering a smooth and easy listening experience.
- Bass presence is good, extending well into the sub-bass with a satisfying rumble without overshadowing the mids.
- The IEM shell has a comfortable, semi-custom fit for many users, and the clear resin allows users to see the drivers.
- The included cable is thick, soft, supple, and of decent quality.
- Good imaging for its price.
Product Considerations
- Some reviewers find the treble response to be relaxed or lacking incisiveness, leading to less detail retrieval and a blunted transient attack.
- Some reviewers found the IEM shouty, especially with female vocals and busy tracks.
- Some reviewers reported issues with the stock cable being too stiff and having memory, also the ear hooks not fitting well.
- The soundstage may not be as wide or 3D as other comparable IEMs.
- One reviewer found that the nozzle was quite small, which may cause issues with tips.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Truthear Hexa, the Hexa has more present treble and more definition on transients.
- Compared to the Moondrop Blessing 3, the Blessing 3 has a big step up in technical performance—including resolution.
- Compared to the Moondrop Kato, the Kato has a punchier mid-bass and a mild V-shaped sound signature.
- Compared to the Aful Performer 5, the 41T has a very similar mid-bass and bass, but is a little less detailed up top.
- Compared to the Shure S12 Pro, the S12 Pro has much more energy.
Takeaway: The 41T is a comfortable IEM with a balanced, warm, and smooth sound signature that's easy to listen to. It is a good option for those seeking a non-fatiguing listening experience.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Video review
Our take on the brand
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.
















.png)


















