Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
Product Strengths
- Exceptional build quality using premium materials like wood and metal, giving it a luxurious look for the price
- Comfortable and lightweight design at around 280-302 grams
- Balanced, natural sound signature with good detail and instrument separation, making it enjoyable for various music genres
- Good passive noise isolation for a closed-back headphone, suitable for commuting and portable use
- Easy to drive and works well with various sources, including smartphones
Product Considerations
- Upper midrange can be a bit too emphasized or aggressive, potentially causing fatigue at higher volumes for some listeners and genres
- Bass response is not emphasized, and might lack punch for bass-heavy music
- Earpads may be a bit small for larger ears, potentially causing discomfort after extended use
- Stock cable is functional, but may be too long for portable use and can exhibit some microphonic noise
- Some reviewers noted the treble could be fatiguing with harsh recordings
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Sivga Robin: A noticeable upgrade, with better definition, nuances, and overall sound refinement; the Robins are warmer, muddier and splashier
- Vs. HIFIMAN Sundara: Better layering, instrument separation and stronger bass, better for metal, fast rock, EDM, pop
- Vs. Verum One MKII: Better layering, a more juicy/sweet sounding midrange, and is less fatiguing
- Vs. Dekoni Blue T50RP Mod: Better layering and instrument separation, and is more energetic, with a sweeter midrange and more treble energy
- Vs. Sivga Phoenix: The Phoenix is smoother, more mature and more relaxing
Takeaway: The Sivga Oriole offers a combination of beautiful design, comfortable wear, and balanced sound, making it a great option for those looking for an enjoyable listening experience on the go or at home. These headphones are an especially good option if you need a good-looking set of headphones that do not need a powerful source.
All
Oriole
reviews

Manufacturer details
- Style: Over-ear
- Transducer Type: Dynamic driver
- Transducer Size: 50 mm
- Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 20 kHz
- Sensitivity: 108 dB ± 3 dB
- Impedance: 32 Ω ± 15%
- Cable Length: 1.8 m ± 0.2 m
- Connector: 3.5 mm
- Weight: 280 g
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
- The brand deviates from a singular house sound, offering a variety of sonic profiles across its product line, catering to diverse listening preferences.
Select products
SIVGA
- Positioning: A lightweight, open-back headphone designed for easy drivability and everyday use.
- Description: Features a 3mm thick high-performance magnet and a specially developed polycarbonate membrane that provide clarity and a simple sound signature. Compared to models like Robin and P-Ⅱ, its design is aimed at casual listeners in small spaces with a modest budget and basic functionality.
Robin - SV021
- Positioning: A closed-back headphone that blends natural wood with metal for a refined yet straightforward design.
- Description: Combines handcrafted redwood with a 50mm dynamic driver to achieve balanced sound without complex tuning. Compared to the entry-level PHOENIX, it offers improved build quality and material choice.
SIVGA P-Ⅱ
- Positioning: A sophisticated wooden headphone emphasizing meticulous craftsmanship for a balanced acoustic experience.
- Description: Uses premium natural solid wood and a dual-sided magnetic driver developed over years to deliver precise and natural sound. When compared to Robin and PHOENIX, its extensive handcrafting and detailed design reflect enhanced acoustic refinement.
SV023
- Positioning: A high-fidelity over-ear headphone built with walnut wood and professional-grade components for detailed sound reproduction.
- Description: Uses a 50mm dynamic driver with imported LCP composite membranes and high-purity 6N OCC cables to ensure dynamic yet nuanced audio. Relative to P-Ⅱ and Robin, its higher impedance and advanced components provide superior performance and expanded functionality.
P2 PRO
- Positioning: A flagship wired headphone that showcases high-end CNC-carved solid wood and metal accents for a modern, premium build.
- Description: Offers clear and bright sound through meticulous red oak construction, accented by CNC-engraved metal parts and imported 6N OCC cables. Compared to all other products in the lineup, its advanced build quality and innovative design provide the most refined option.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
Used
SIVGA
What if you spend more?
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Excellent wireless sound quality with clarity, detail, and balanced, refined sound.
- Good technical performance, particularly soundstage width.
- Multiple hifi audio codecs are supported, including LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Lossless.
- The Edifier ConneX app provides a customizable EQ.
- Long battery life is quoted at 80 hours.
Product Considerations
- Active noise cancellation is lacking.
- Some reviewers find the fit awkward, with inadequate clamping force.
- Treble can sound a little metallic or plasticky.
- The use of animal hide might deter some buyers.
- The volume on wireless mode isn't always loud enough.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Sony WH-1000XM5 and Sennheiser Momentum 4, the Spirit S5 offers a more audiophile-like presentation with better soundstage and clarity.
- The Spirit S5 destroys the Sony WH-1000XM5 and the Sennheiser Momentum 4s in terms of sound quality.
- The S5 sounds better than the Stax Spirit S3, with improvements across the board and new features.
Takeaway: The Stax Spirit S5 is a great-sounding wireless headphone that is comfortable and offers modern convenience. It is an excellent choice for anyone wanting to enjoy music with detail and clarity.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Uses premium materials like carbon fiber, metal, sheep lambskin earpads, and zebra wood faceplates for a luxurious feel, with excellent build quality
- Has a mostly neutral sound signature, with lambskin pads bass response is very good with a tasteful emphasis placed on the sub-bass region, and a decent midrange
- Provides good detail retrieval, resolution, and transparency of sound, the drivers can show plenty of information and micro detail
- A pad swapping system allows changes to sound characteristics, with lambskin pads and breathable fabric pads included
- Comes with a quarter-inch adapter and a 4-pin XLR adapter for use with portable or desktop devices
Product Considerations
- The stock cable is 3 meters long, which is too long for desktop use
- Headband adjustment can be a little stiff to move
- With leather pads, the highs can get slightly sharp
- There is a slight sharpness in the upper treble that might pose a problem for some listeners, using fabric pads can mitigate this
- Weight distribution could be better, there's not enough padding on the headband, and the clamp force is low, this distributes all the weight across the top of the head, which can be bothersome after 40-50 minutes
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs HiFiMan Susvara: Has a similar driver structure
- Vs HiFiMan HE1000 Unveiled: Is close in terms of technical performance like resolution, transient response, soundstage, depth, and openness
- Vs HiFiMan Arya Stealth: Has a better build quality and bass response
Takeaway: The FiiO FT7 is a well-built, comfortable headphone that offers a neutral-leaning-warm sound that can be tailored with different earpads. The FT7 competes with other headphones that cost significantly more, making it a great pick at its price point.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Excellent stereo separation for mixing and monitoring
- Built with aluminum, it has a durable feel
- Designed for reference listening
- Clean, linear, and very detailed mids
Product Considerations
- Sound can be considered somewhat restrained, lacking upper midrange and low to HF 'hype'
- Cloth ear pads may not feel as soft or luxurious as velour pads on some other headphones
- Lacks impact and bite
- Headband padding is uncomfortable
- Single-entry cable is on the right side, which is an unusual placement
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD650: Differences come down to something similar to a full-range studio monitor versus a full-range hifi speaker of equal build quality and similar design, Sennheisers are geared more towards enjoying the brain-pleasing sounds of music, while you probably want to mix with the Neumanns
- Vs Sennheiser HD600/650: The HD600 and HD650 are more comfortable, with a better industrial design than the NDH-30
Takeaway: The Neumann NDH 30 is a tool that can be very helpful for mixing sessions, especially for identifying details in the mid-range of a mix. Its design and build quality also make it a lasting product.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- The Wraith features an all-metal alloy body that feels sturdy and durable
- The earcups feature a rotating mechanism, making it convenient to rest the headphones around the neck
- The design is considered stylish, industrial, and unique
- The suspension headband design distributes weight evenly, making it comfortable to wear for long listening sessions
Product Considerations
- The Wraith's headband adjustment system is not very practical and requires a screwdriver to adjust
- Stock pads may not create the best seal, impacting sound isolation
- The soundstage is intimate, and the resolution is average
- The 2.5mm connectors on the earcups might limit replacement cable options
- Sub-bass can roll off with stock pads
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs HiFiMan Edition XS: The Edition XS has better resolution, clarity, and sub-bass response out of the box, but the Wraith has superior build quality, materials, robustness, and comfort
- Vs Sendy Audio Aiva: The Wraith and Aiva share a similar bass roll-off
- Vs Moondrop Venus: The Moondrop Venus costs slightly more and provides a wider soundstage and more refined sound
Takeaway: The ThieAudio Wraith has excellent build quality and a unique design, making them durable and comfortable for many users. The sound is warm and laid-back, making them suitable for casual listening.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Beautifully made with real wooden cups, nice metallic flourishes, and a nice adjustment system
- Very easy to drive from any device due to its 32 ohm impedance and 103 dB sensitivity
- The included hard case is of good quality and protective
- Comfortable to wear for extended sessions due to its light weight (296g) and well-designed headband
- Good soundstage width and overall space, with well-defined instrument separation
Product Considerations
- Some reviewers with larger ears may find the earcups to be too small, causing discomfort
- Lack of extra treble detail and energy means that some percussion misses its snap and shimmer
- The headband size is pretty small, so if your head is on the large side, it might not fit
- Stock earpads are too shallow for some users, causing their ears to touch the inside of the cups
- The midrange can sound stuffy and veiled, lacking clarity and detail compared to some competitors
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Monolith M1060 V2: The Phoenix has better quality treble, but the M1060 has a better quantity of treble and a more neutral sound
- Vs Sennheiser HD560S: The HD560S is a reference headphone designed to be analytical and neutral, while the Phoenix is colored, engaging, rich, and warm
- Vs Sennheiser HD600: The Phoenix is warmer, has deeper sub-bass extension, and a wider soundstage, but the HD600 is more intimate, clear, and detailed in the mids and vocals
- Vs beyerdynamic DT880: The DT880 has a midbass bump and clearer mids, while the Phoenix has better treble extension
- Vs HarmonicDyne Zeus: The Zeus is a warmer set, but the Phoenix is better implemented
- Vs Austrian Audio Hi-X55: The Phoenix has a more environmental feel when it comes to its sub-bass response and a wider soundstage, but the Hi-X55 has a sweeter vocal presentation
Takeaway: The Phoenix offers a warm, rich, and punchy sound signature in a beautifully designed and comfortable package that is easy to drive. It could be a great option for those who enjoy a bass-emphasized sound and listen to genres where extra bass is beneficial.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- The Anser is wonderfully comfortable.
- Exceptional build quality, with premium materials rarely seen at this price point.
- It delivers a sound that's well-balanced across all frequencies.
- The Anser is easy to drive from absolutely anything.
- It has a nice sense of weight and presence in its sound, particularly in vocals and solo instrumentals.
Product Considerations
- The soundstage is somewhat restricted in width.
- The midrange is not great.
- The stock cable is a little stiff.
- Treble enthusiasts may occasionally find the presentation less energetic.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD 560s: The Anser is significantly more comfortable and feels better built than the HD 560s, but the HD 560s is a little brighter and sharper in the treble.
- Vs Drop and Sennheiser HD 6XX: The Anser would win for most people on build quality and possibly comfort too, and is going to win for bass because extends down deep, and it's solid and full.
- Vs Philips Fidelio X2HR: The X2HR has a wider, more open soundstage, and a little more nuance in the midrange.
- Vs Sivga Oriole: The Anser has slight advantages, such as soundstage, which is still limited but nevertheless better than the Oriole.
- Vs FiiO FT1 Pro: The Anser has a slightly warmer sound signature, with a more pronounced bass response.
Takeaway: The Sivga Anser offers great build quality and is very comfortable, making it a great choice for people who want a fun and engaging listening experience. This is a headphone that prioritizes musicality over technical prowess, offering an inviting sound.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Excellent build quality, using premium materials like metal headbands and yokes, wood cups, and soft leather or velvet for comfort
- Comfortable, with plush ear pads and a lightweight design, making it suitable for long listening sessions
- Easy to drive and scales well with better gear
- The sound signature has a good balance of detail, musicality, and accurate tonality, making it a versatile option
- Clarity and separation of instruments with a good soundstage and decent imaging
Product Considerations
- The included cable is of lesser quality compared to the build, noting its stiffness and memory effect
- The bass response may not satisfy bassheads as it rolls off slightly in the sub-bass region
- The treble and upper mids can be a bit forward or 'shouty', potentially causing listening fatigue for treble-sensitive individuals
- The symmetrical design can make it difficult to quickly discern the left and right sides
- The included case is not aesthetically pleasing to all reviewers
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD 600: The Luan has better bass and a larger soundstage, but the HD 600 is slightly better in tone and timbre
- Vs Sivga Robin: The Luan has a different sound and build quality than the Robin, which is more aggressive
- Vs beyerdynamic DT900 Pro X: The mids have better details on the DT900 Pro X
Takeaway: The Sivga Luan is a well-built and comfortable headphone with a balanced sound, making it a great choice for extended listening and versatile across different sources. It is a stylish, easy-to-drive headphone with enough punch and clarity to appeal to a wide range of listeners.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Good sound for the price point
- Well-balanced sound
- Decent build quality
- Included a well-made travel case
Product Considerations
- Clamping force may be a bit tight for some users
- Weight may be on the heavier side for some
- Lacks sub-bass
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Sendy Aiva, the P-II has slightly greater mid-bass emphasis
- Compared to the HiFiMan Sundara, the Sundara's sub-bass sounds more muted and less obvious
Takeaway: The P-II is a beautiful headphone that offers an amazing and a well-balanced sound for long listening sessions, and the build quality looks like an art piece. This headphone is a good option for a fun and enjoyable listening experience.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Solid build quality and premium aesthetics with wooden earcups and comfortable earpads
- Generally comfortable and lightweight design
- Easy to drive, suitable for use with smartphones or low-powered sources
- Fun, musical sound signature, versatile and well-rounded, great for casual listening and gaming
- Good imaging, soundstage, and detail retrieval for a closed-back headphone at its price point
Product Considerations
- Midrange can be recessed and sometimes distant
- V-shaped sound signature might not be ideal for those seeking a neutral reference sound
- Can get warm or hot, especially in warmer climates
- Loose fit for smaller heads may affect sound perception
- Treble may get harsh or sibilant on poorly mixed tracks or at higher volumes
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro: SV021 has more bass quantity, while DT990 Pro has thicker leading edges on bass notes and a more forward treble
- Vs Sivga Oriole: Oriole is an improvement over Robin in almost every way, with a better sound signature, forward mids, better detail, and a more satisfying bass impact
- Vs Fostex TH610: TH610 sounds more correct and neutral, with more definition in its bass, while SV021 is bassier, warmer—and thicker
- Vs Meze 99C: The Robin has deeper, wider soundstage and better imaging, it is also cleaner, with better sparkle in the treble and more air
Takeaway: The Sivga Robin SV021 is a stylish and comfortable pair of headphones that offers a fun and engaging listening experience. It is a good choice for anyone seeking an aesthetically pleasing and versatile closed-back headphone for casual use and gaming, especially if they enjoy a warmer, bass-forward sound.
Video review
Our take on the brand
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.
























.png)






.png)











