Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
All
VE ONE
reviews
Manufacturer details
- Driver Configuration: 2 drivers (Hybrid: 1 × Dynamic Driver + 1 × Balanced Armature)
- System: 2-way
- Impedance: 8.7 Ω @ 1 kHz
- Frequency Response: 10 Hz – 18 kHz
- Sound Signature: Balanced, natural, dynamic with solid low-end and crisp highs
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
Select products
VE ONE
- Positioning: An entry-level custom in-ear monitor offering a solid introduction to professional sound quality.
- Description: Delivers a balanced and energetic sound using a hybrid system with one dynamic and one balanced armature driver that provides improved resolution and natural tone. Compared to higher models in the lineup which offer more drivers and advanced features, it suits users with smaller rooms, modest budgets, and basic functionality needs.
VE XCON
- Positioning: A versatile custom in-ear monitor that emphasizes adaptability with sound profile switching.
- Description: Features a magnetic switch that allows users to easily switch between a powerful, engaging sound and a neutral, analytical signature. Compared to the simpler VE ONE and more intricate VE ZEN, its complex four-way crossover and dual sound modes provide varied functionality.
VE ZEN
- Positioning: A high-end custom in-ear monitor designed as the flagship with an advanced multi-driver setup.
- Description: Combines nine balanced armature drivers with a dynamic driver and integrated pressure relief valve to deliver a spacious and detailed sound stage. Compared to the entry-level VE ONE and the versatile VE XCON, its superior resolution and broader frequency range meet the demands of larger rooms and users with higher technical expectations.
EXT MK II - LIMITED EDITION
- Positioning: A premium limited-edition in-ear monitor from the Premium Line built for refined sound performance.
- Description: Uses advanced technologies such as a three-way crossover, re-designed dynamic drivers, and second-generation HALC tuning to produce deep, accurate lows and clear highs. Compared to the PHONIX, it offers innovative tuning and a distinctive design.
PHÖNIX
- Positioning: A top-tier premium in-ear monitor featuring sophisticated engineering and an elegant, multi-material design.
- Description: Integrates 13 balanced armature drivers per side managed by a passive five-way network to deliver a powerful and finely detailed sound profile with natural mids and airy highs. Compared to the EXT MK II Limited Edition, its refined aesthetics and balanced tonal characteristics showcase comprehensive functionality.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
Used
Vision Ears
What if you spend more?
Product Strengths
- Natural timbre and a lush, organic sound, balancing detail and technical performance with enveloping warmth
- Smooth and balanced sound signature with excellent body, rich mids, and gorgeous vocals, making it enjoyable for long listening sessions
- Vivid imaging and a vast soundstage, giving a sense of grandiosity and wonder, enhancing its articulate clarity
- Quality materials like carbon fiber are use for durability and light weight, with an aesthetically pleasing faceplate
- Great detail retrieval, and some details are further back in the layers of music, but it is still there
Product Considerations
- May be too big for those with smaller ears due to its moderately large size and wide nozzle
- Bass is more focused on midbass with some euphonic bleed into the low mids, and subbass rolls off, which may not satisfy bass enthusiasts
- The silicone tips included may be hard to use
- Not a reference tuning
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Noble Viking Ragnar: The Viking Ragnar emphasizes treble more, with a stronger sense of air and definition, while the Phönix is more relaxed, the Viking Ragnar is for analytical listening, while the Phönix is for a more relaxed experience
- Vs Empire Ears Odin: The Odin has more bass texture, resolution, and deeper extension, the Phönix has fuller and richer mids
- Vs Empire Ears Legend Evo: The Legend Evo is bassier and more exciting, while the Phönix places bass more in line with the rest of the signature and has a wider stage
- Vs 64 Audio Noir: The Noir sounds grander and bigger, with stronger bass, while the Phönix has a more balanced signature and better-controlled bass
- Vs Vision Ears Erlkönig: The Erlkönig's bass is softer, and the Phönix pushes more volume in the upper-mid and treble sections, the Phönix gives more glow and better extension up top
- Vs Vision Ears EXT: The EXT has more sub-bass, with better texture, control, and resolution, the Phönix has fuller and richer mids, while the EXT has lighter vocals
Takeaway: The Vision Ears Phönix is a great choice for anyone looking for a flagship IEM that will make music come alive with a smooth, detailed, and natural sound. It is made for long listening sessions and pure music enjoyment.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Video review
Our take on the brand
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Excellent technical performance and detail retrieval, considered several cuts above other IEMs
- Outstanding imaging performance, with precise soundstage and instrument separation
- The bass response is a highlight, delivering a punchy sub-bass with texture and articulation
- Offers a warmer tonal balance that is easy to get into with a mostly 'neutral' sound
- Bone conduction enhances low-frequency extension, reverb, and detail
Product Considerations
- Large chassis that may be uncomfortable for some users, particularly those with smaller ears
- The subdued treble range may not provide enough energy and sparkle for some listeners
- Stock cable is lackluster in terms of usability due to its plasticky feel, rigidity, and microphonic feedback
- Driver flex (a harmless crinkling sound upon insertion) is present
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Legend Evo delivers a stronger bass impact, depth, and extension than the Legend X
- Legend Evo produces better constructed highs than the Legend X
- Legend Evo shows better clarity than the Legend X, and has more detail
- The Legend X can sound veiled concerning the Legend Evo
- The Legend Evo feels a touch smoother than the Empire Ears ODIN
Takeaway: The Legend Evo is a top-tier IEM with innovative bone conduction technology that creates a unique and immersive listening experience with enhanced bass. It is a great option for those seeking flagship-level performance with a warm, bass-focused sound signature.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Impressive technical performance, clarity, detail retrieval, and resolution due to its planar magnetic drivers.
- Features a new, comfortable, and ergonomic shell design that's also lightweight and durable.
- Includes two upgraded Time Stream Metal cables, providing both 3.5mm and 4.4mm terminations.
- Delivers a strong, extended bass response, with texture and speed, plus a nimble, airy top-end.
- Exhibits a spacious, wide, and holographic soundstage with good imaging and instrument separation.
Product Considerations
- Lower sensitivity might require a dedicated DAP or amplifier for optimal performance, and can sound anemic when paired with just a phone.
- Can be sensitive to source pairings, warmer DACs might wash out the mids and some pairings may bring out sibilance.
- Stock tips might not provide the best seal for everyone, and the stock tip selection is poor.
- Silicone eartips can make the treble sound harsh.
- The mirror-finished stainless steel faceplate is prone to fingerprints and smudges.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Campfire Audio Bonneville: Astrolith has superior mids, clarity, detail and transparency, and better treble extension, articulation, and overall resolution.
- Vs 64 Audio Volür: Astrolith offers bigger bass and a more exciting presentation, as well as faster and more resolving sound, but Volür is more accurate overall.
- Vs. Oriolus Monachaa: Astrolith has a faster and more controlled bass with better texture, a more natural and realistic midrange with a fabulous timbre.
- Vs. Elysian Acoustic Labs Annihilator: Astrolith delivers a more robust and organic mid-range with realistic and natural timbre and more defined lower mids.
Takeaway: The Astrolith is a technically impressive IEM with a comfortable design that delivers a powerful and detailed sound. It could be a great pick for listeners who want high-end sound that can play all kinds of music well.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Captures the sound of the original Svanar, with a balanced tuning emphasizing bass and treble while maintaining the mids
- Incredible imaging performance, offering a wide, well-rounded, three-dimensional soundstage with excellent positioning and separation—highly competitive, even compared to non-TWS IEMs under $1000
- Has an R2R DAC which permits unreachable technical performance
- Very light and comfortable
- Excellent connectivity and usability
Product Considerations
- LDAC connectivity issues with invasive intermittence and noise cutting
- ANC and Transparency mode aren’t very useful and lack dynamic, delivering leaner dynamic, less musicality
- Plastic build might not be most durable if dropped
- High-frequencies are quite sensible to the source, making it one of the least forgiving TWS
- Hiss is also present
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- The Svanar Wireless is punchier, with better bass detail and imaging, and a wider soundstage, while the Final ZE8000 has a warmer, more neutral sound
- The Svanar Wireless has stronger imaging performance, a wider soundstage, and a better balance between separation and cohesion
- The Svanar Wireless is superior in technicalities and tonal balance, as well as timbre and tone naturalness, and ultimately musicality
- The Svanar Wireless' soundstage is taller and wider but not as deep, since clarity isn’t as sharp and clean, silence being more "noisy"
- The Svanar Wireless has better sound and performs better technically
- The Sony TWS has bloated bass that overwhelms everything else; in comparison, the soundstage and treble performance of the Svanar Wireless is miles ahead, presenting a much more detailed, natural, and sophisticated kind of sound
Takeaway: The Svanar Wireless sounds impressive for wireless earbuds, and it has great connectivity and features. For those seeking high-end wireless sound, these are worth considering.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Praised for its beautiful design
- Very comfortable, almost expected from an IEM based on resin
- Easy to drive due to its low impedance and high sensitivity
- Provides a lot of clarity
- Has a very natural tonality, even with balanced drivers
Product Considerations
- Its design might be too fragile and prone to scratches
- May lack impact and slam for music with a lot of low-octave focus
- Some amplifiers might not synergize well, needing experimentation
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Moondrop variations, the Cadenza is preferred for its handling of transitions
Takeaway: The Cadenza is a beautiful IEM with great clarity that's also comfortable to wear. It is an easy to drive IEM, with great potential to provide enjoyable listening sessions.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Versatile sound signature, going from bassy to neutral with the use of included tuning modules
- Excellent bass response with a dynamic driver, providing strong texture, deep extension, and impact
- Very good treble extension, air, and sparkle for detail retrieval without harshness
- Expertly captures the 64 Audio character of balancing pro audio sensibilities and a more audiophile-friendly sound
- Comfortable and durable design, with a lightweight anodized aluminum shell and well-thought-out accessories
Product Considerations
- Imaging and instrument separation are decent, but not standout for the price range
- Mid-range may sound a bit thin to some, with a more relaxed upper mid-range that results in vocals being a little bit on the husky side
- The nozzle doesn’t have lip holder and is a bit problematic
- Isolation isn't exceptional due to the apex module
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs 64 Audio Neo: U4S is preferred due to the U4S being the cheaper IEM
- Vs Thieaudio Monarch MkII: The Monarch is comparatively lean sounding
- Vs 64 Audio U6T: U6T is a little more neutral overall with a stronger technicality, but the U4S injects a little more fun into the sound
- Vs Campfire Audio Andromeda Emerald Sea: The U4S offers a more natural mid-range presentation
- Vs 64 Audio Nio: The U4s effectively undercuts the Nio by a third of the price with comparable sound quality
- Vs Custom Art Fibae 5: If you want technicalities and details, Fibae 5 is superior, if you want a very capable yet slightly musical and mainstream IEM, opt for the U4s
Takeaway:
The 64 Audio U4s is a well-rounded IEM that offers a fun and engaging sound signature with the ability to customize the bass response. With its comfortable fit and excellent build quality, it's a great option for those looking for a versatile and enjoyable listening experience.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Questions? Ask the brand's dealers.
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.















.png)







.png)












