Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
Product Strengths
- Excellent build quality using premium materials like rosewood and metal, with no plastic parts visible.
- Very good comfort due to its lightweight design (365g-395g), well-made headband, and soft goatskin earpads.
- Comes with a high-quality 6N OCC copper braided cable and a premium carrying bag made from genuine leather.
- The Apollo delivers a relaxed, soft, largely linear, and natural sound signature with a mild warmth and musicality.
- Impressive soundstage and dynamic range, with especially natural mids.
Product Considerations
- Earpads use synthetic leather, which may get hot during extended use.
- Decent amplification is required to perform at its best, such as high-end players or amplifiers.
- The stock cable can pick up minor noise if you walk around wearing the headphones.
- Treble response might be too smooth for listeners seeking emphasized high frequencies.
- Some reviewers found the center mid emphasis could lead to a boxy sound signature in some instances.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Dan Clark Audio Aeon Flow RT: Apollo has superior cable quality and comfort, Aeon Flow RT has recessed mids, strong sub-bass and sharp highs, while Apollo boasts mid-centric, smooth, relaxed sound.
- Vs Sennheiser HD660S: Apollo wins on build and comfort, HD660S is more detailed, sharper, and punchier, while Apollo is smoother, more musical, and easier to enjoy over longer sessions.
- Vs ADAM Audio Studio PRO SP-5: Apollo beats SP-5 in comfort and build quality, SP-5 is brighter, more detailed, and has a wider soundstage, but can sound harsh and digital, while Apollo is smoother and more musical.
Takeaway: The Apollo is a well-built and comfortable headphone that offers a smooth, natural sound, especially excelling in the midrange. It is a great choice for those who want a relaxing and musical listening experience.
All
Apollo
reviews

Manufacturer details
- Style: Over-ear
- Driver Type: Planar magnetic driver
- Driver Size: 68 mm
- Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 40 kHz
- Impedance: 16 Ω ±15%
- Sensitivity: 95 dB ±3 dB
- Weight: 395 g
- Cable Length: 2.0 m ±0.2 m
- Connector: 4.4 mm balanced
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
- Their headphones offer a distinct aesthetic blending a natural wood finish with industrial grille designs, creating a unique luxury-meets-tech aesthetic.
- The brand’s planar magnetic headphones provide a fast and precise sound with crisp details.
Select products
AIYA
- Position: Entry-level line, designed for affordability and compactness.
- Description: Features a 21mm ultra nano composite planar magnetic diaphragm that delivers clear and balanced sound in a small, portable design. Compared to the over-ear models in the lineup, it suits those with modest budgets and small room or on-the-go needs, while models like Aiva 2, Apollo, AIVA, and Peacock deliver larger drivers and more advanced features for expanded functionality.
Aiva 2
- Position: Budget planar magnetic headphone offering balanced performance for everyday listening.
- Description: Uses an ultra-thin high-strength diaphragm that clearly reproduces mids, highs, and a wide sound stage. When compared to the in-ear AIYA and other over-ear options like Apollo, AIVA, and the flagship Peacock, it meets practical functionality and moderate budget tolerance without extra advanced features.
Apollo
- Position: Entry-level open-back over-ear headphone that balances style with performance.
- Description: Features a 68mm diaphragm paired with a unique wood earcup and steel mesh design that provides natural sound reproduction and comfortable wear. In comparison to models such as Aiva 2 and AIVA, it offers a traditional design, though it lacks some of the advanced driver and material refinements seen in the higher-tier Peacock.
AIVA
- Position: Mid-range open-back over-ear headphone focused on detailed sound reproduction.
- Description: Includes a larger 97×76mm driver and refined wood components that help deliver natural, clear vocals and deep bass, setting it apart in clarity and performance. Relative to the simpler designs of Apollo and Aiva 2, AIVA targets users willing to invest a bit more for improved detail and a fuller sound stage.
Peacock
- Position: High-end open-back over-ear headphone positioned as the flagship with advanced design and performance.
- Description: Features an 88mm ultra-thin composite diaphragm that extends high frequencies and offers a wide, natural sound stage, backed by high-end materials and meticulous craftsmanship. Compared to every other product in the lineup—from the in-ear AIYA to the entry-level Apollo—Peacock is ideal for users with a higher budget looking for top performance, advanced technology, and functionality suited for larger spaces.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
Used
Sendy
What if you spend more?
Product Strengths
- Premium build quality and materials, including zebrawood earcups, leather, aluminum, and steel
- Detailed and resolving sound signature, with an airy and extended high-end
- Wide soundstage and precise imaging for an immersive listening experience
- Comfortable for long listening sessions due to a well-designed comfort strap and plush earpads
- High-quality stock cable made of 6N single crystal copper
Product Considerations
- Can sound sharp or metallic if underpowered, requiring a powerful and warm source
- Bass response is somewhat reserved, lacking significant impact for some listeners
- Lower mids can lack presence and definition compared to the upper midsection
- Treble can be bright and fatiguing for some, and may exhibit mild veiling in densely orchestrated tracks
- Driver matching may not be perfect past 2kHz, potentially causing channel imbalance
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sivga P2 Pro: Aiva 2 sounds more balanced and relaxed with a warmer tonality compared to P2 Pro, which has a slightly brighter tonality due to a more elevated upper midrange
- Vs Sennheiser HD600: Aiva offers superior design, materials, cable, technicalities, and a wider frequency response
Takeaway: The Sendy Audio Aiva 2 is a beautifully crafted headphone that delivers a detailed and engaging sound, perfect for listeners who appreciate clarity and high-frequency sparkle. With its comfortable design and premium build, the Aiva 2 provides a luxurious listening experience.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Premium build with high-quality materials like Zebrawood earcups and a steel headband
- Designed for comfort with plush earpads and a well-made headband
- Balanced and natural sound signature that is easy to listen to
- Includes a high-quality stock cable made of 6N single-crystal copper
- Fairly wide and immersive soundstage
Product Considerations
- Lower mid-range could use more body
- Treble might be a bit too sharp for some listeners, and can be exaggerated with bright sources
- Imaging is good, but not the most precise
- Some reviewers find the midrange a bit inexpressive and lacking emotion
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. SIVGA P2 Pro: The Aiva 2 has better materials and build quality and a more balanced sound, while the P2 Pro is brighter with a more elevated upper midrange
- Vs. HIFIMAN Ananda Nano: The Aiva 2 has more mid-range emphasis and less treble emphasis; the Ananda Nano delivers more texture and detail in the upper registers and is crisper and clearer by comparison, with a larger soundstage
- Vs. Sennheiser HD 6XX series: The Aiva 2 has better bass with more punch and impact, and is more dynamic
- Vs. HIFIMAN Edition XS and Ananda/Arya: Aiva 2 has better bass presence; HIFIMAN offerings may have better resolution or stage
Takeaway: The Sendy Audio Aiva 2 is a well-built and comfortable headphone with a balanced and natural sound that is suitable for long listening sessions. It is a good choice for those seeking a stylish headphone with a focus on musicality and craftsmanship.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Uses premium materials like carbon fiber, metal, sheep lambskin earpads, and zebra wood faceplates for a luxurious feel, with excellent build quality
- Has a mostly neutral sound signature, with lambskin pads bass response is very good with a tasteful emphasis placed on the sub-bass region, and a decent midrange
- Provides good detail retrieval, resolution, and transparency of sound, the drivers can show plenty of information and micro detail
- A pad swapping system allows changes to sound characteristics, with lambskin pads and breathable fabric pads included
- Comes with a quarter-inch adapter and a 4-pin XLR adapter for use with portable or desktop devices
Product Considerations
- The stock cable is 3 meters long, which is too long for desktop use
- Headband adjustment can be a little stiff to move
- With leather pads, the highs can get slightly sharp
- There is a slight sharpness in the upper treble that might pose a problem for some listeners, using fabric pads can mitigate this
- Weight distribution could be better, there's not enough padding on the headband, and the clamp force is low, this distributes all the weight across the top of the head, which can be bothersome after 40-50 minutes
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs HiFiMan Susvara: Has a similar driver structure
- Vs HiFiMan HE1000 Unveiled: Is close in terms of technical performance like resolution, transient response, soundstage, depth, and openness
- Vs HiFiMan Arya Stealth: Has a better build quality and bass response
Takeaway: The FiiO FT7 is a well-built, comfortable headphone that offers a neutral-leaning-warm sound that can be tailored with different earpads. The FT7 competes with other headphones that cost significantly more, making it a great pick at its price point.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Excellent stereo separation for mixing and monitoring
- Built with aluminum, it has a durable feel
- Designed for reference listening
- Clean, linear, and very detailed mids
Product Considerations
- Sound can be considered somewhat restrained, lacking upper midrange and low to HF 'hype'
- Cloth ear pads may not feel as soft or luxurious as velour pads on some other headphones
- Lacks impact and bite
- Headband padding is uncomfortable
- Single-entry cable is on the right side, which is an unusual placement
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD650: Differences come down to something similar to a full-range studio monitor versus a full-range hifi speaker of equal build quality and similar design, Sennheisers are geared more towards enjoying the brain-pleasing sounds of music, while you probably want to mix with the Neumanns
- Vs Sennheiser HD600/650: The HD600 and HD650 are more comfortable, with a better industrial design than the NDH-30
Takeaway: The Neumann NDH 30 is a tool that can be very helpful for mixing sessions, especially for identifying details in the mid-range of a mix. Its design and build quality also make it a lasting product.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- The HD 560S delivers a flat sound profile that should suit most musical genres
- Very comfortable, with a relatively lightweight design and plenty of plush padding
- Soundstage is exemplary
- Lightweight and provide a nimble feel
- Excels in delivering both vocals and instruments with a remarkable level of clarity and precision
Product Considerations
- Some users might find it a bit dull over time due to its conservative sound signature
- Can be a bit intense at times in the lower treble
- The plastic construction does not scream luxury
- Some loss of texture in the mid-bass, with bass notes of different instruments often sounding the same
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs AKG K702: 560S' sound is going to feel a bit closer, but it may not always be a good thing when trying to hear what is farther off in the distance, for gaming
- Vs Sennheiser HD58X: The 560S is cleaner and more accurate sounding than the HD58X
- Vs Sennheiser HD600: The 560S is more intimate and livelier sounding than the darker HD600
- Vs HIFIMAN Sundara: Compared to the more expensive Hifiman Sundara, the 560S sounds like it lacks detail across the frequency spectrum, except in the sub bass region where the Sundara does not seem to dig as deep
Takeaway: The Sennheiser HD560S is a comfortable headphone with a well-balanced sound, making it a solid choice for both gamers and music enthusiasts looking for neutrality and clarity. It is a versatile headphone for various genres and applications.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Beautifully made with real wooden cups, nice metallic flourishes, and a nice adjustment system
- Very easy to drive from any device due to its 32 ohm impedance and 103 dB sensitivity
- The included hard case is of good quality and protective
- Comfortable to wear for extended sessions due to its light weight (296g) and well-designed headband
- Good soundstage width and overall space, with well-defined instrument separation
Product Considerations
- Some reviewers with larger ears may find the earcups to be too small, causing discomfort
- Lack of extra treble detail and energy means that some percussion misses its snap and shimmer
- The headband size is pretty small, so if your head is on the large side, it might not fit
- Stock earpads are too shallow for some users, causing their ears to touch the inside of the cups
- The midrange can sound stuffy and veiled, lacking clarity and detail compared to some competitors
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Monolith M1060 V2: The Phoenix has better quality treble, but the M1060 has a better quantity of treble and a more neutral sound
- Vs Sennheiser HD560S: The HD560S is a reference headphone designed to be analytical and neutral, while the Phoenix is colored, engaging, rich, and warm
- Vs Sennheiser HD600: The Phoenix is warmer, has deeper sub-bass extension, and a wider soundstage, but the HD600 is more intimate, clear, and detailed in the mids and vocals
- Vs beyerdynamic DT880: The DT880 has a midbass bump and clearer mids, while the Phoenix has better treble extension
- Vs HarmonicDyne Zeus: The Zeus is a warmer set, but the Phoenix is better implemented
- Vs Austrian Audio Hi-X55: The Phoenix has a more environmental feel when it comes to its sub-bass response and a wider soundstage, but the Hi-X55 has a sweeter vocal presentation
Takeaway: The Phoenix offers a warm, rich, and punchy sound signature in a beautifully designed and comfortable package that is easy to drive. It could be a great option for those who enjoy a bass-emphasized sound and listen to genres where extra bass is beneficial.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- The Anser is wonderfully comfortable.
- Exceptional build quality, with premium materials rarely seen at this price point.
- It delivers a sound that's well-balanced across all frequencies.
- The Anser is easy to drive from absolutely anything.
- It has a nice sense of weight and presence in its sound, particularly in vocals and solo instrumentals.
Product Considerations
- The soundstage is somewhat restricted in width.
- The midrange is not great.
- The stock cable is a little stiff.
- Treble enthusiasts may occasionally find the presentation less energetic.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD 560s: The Anser is significantly more comfortable and feels better built than the HD 560s, but the HD 560s is a little brighter and sharper in the treble.
- Vs Drop and Sennheiser HD 6XX: The Anser would win for most people on build quality and possibly comfort too, and is going to win for bass because extends down deep, and it's solid and full.
- Vs Philips Fidelio X2HR: The X2HR has a wider, more open soundstage, and a little more nuance in the midrange.
- Vs Sivga Oriole: The Anser has slight advantages, such as soundstage, which is still limited but nevertheless better than the Oriole.
- Vs FiiO FT1 Pro: The Anser has a slightly warmer sound signature, with a more pronounced bass response.
Takeaway: The Sivga Anser offers great build quality and is very comfortable, making it a great choice for people who want a fun and engaging listening experience. This is a headphone that prioritizes musicality over technical prowess, offering an inviting sound.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Excellent build quality, using premium materials like metal headbands and yokes, wood cups, and soft leather or velvet for comfort
- Comfortable, with plush ear pads and a lightweight design, making it suitable for long listening sessions
- Easy to drive and scales well with better gear
- The sound signature has a good balance of detail, musicality, and accurate tonality, making it a versatile option
- Clarity and separation of instruments with a good soundstage and decent imaging
Product Considerations
- The included cable is of lesser quality compared to the build, noting its stiffness and memory effect
- The bass response may not satisfy bassheads as it rolls off slightly in the sub-bass region
- The treble and upper mids can be a bit forward or 'shouty', potentially causing listening fatigue for treble-sensitive individuals
- The symmetrical design can make it difficult to quickly discern the left and right sides
- The included case is not aesthetically pleasing to all reviewers
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD 600: The Luan has better bass and a larger soundstage, but the HD 600 is slightly better in tone and timbre
- Vs Sivga Robin: The Luan has a different sound and build quality than the Robin, which is more aggressive
- Vs beyerdynamic DT900 Pro X: The mids have better details on the DT900 Pro X
Takeaway: The Sivga Luan is a well-built and comfortable headphone with a balanced sound, making it a great choice for extended listening and versatile across different sources. It is a stylish, easy-to-drive headphone with enough punch and clarity to appeal to a wide range of listeners.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Good build quality for the price
- Comfortable, especially with the updated headband design
- Decent detail retrieval and resolution throughout the frequency range
- A good entry point for trying planar drivers
- Good imaging and instrument separation
Product Considerations
- Stock cable is of very low quality and microphonic, replacement is recommended
- Sub-bass is lacking, and the bass response may not satisfy bass enthusiasts
- Treble can get fatiguing with potential peaks
- Pads flatten out quickly
- An amplifier is needed to shine
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs HIFIMAN Sundara: HE400se has a brighter sound, while the Sundara is smoother with a warmer quality, and the Sundara is significantly better overall and worth the upgrade
- Vs HIFIMAN HD560S: HE400se has a smoother treble presentation
Takeaway: The HE400se provides a taste of planar sound at an affordable price and is great for those wanting to experiment with modifications. The HE400se is definitely worth it for anyone looking for open back headphones with great sound.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Questions? Ask the brand's dealers.
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.
























.png)











