Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
Product Strengths
- Noted for being a very lightweight and comfortable headset for long gaming sessions.
- The open-back design contributes to a spacious and wide soundstage, enhancing the listening experience.
- Reviewers praise the clarity and balanced sound, making it suitable for both gaming and music.
- The microphone is detachable and provides good quality audio for in-game communication.
- The design is simple and elegant, making it suitable for non-gaming use as well.
Product Considerations
- The open-back design results in significant sound leakage, which may not be suitable for use in quiet environments or around others.
- Some reviewers find the build quality to feel somewhat flimsy due to the lightweight plastic construction.
- The volume wheel placement can be a bit difficult to access and use on the fly.
- The stock cable, while detachable, might feel a little thin and flimsy.
- The open back design allows a significant amount of ambient noise to get through.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the ATH-GL3, the GDL3 has a more spacious and airy sound compared to the warmer, more grounded sound of the GL3.
- The Epos H3 has a little bit more clamping force and doesn't strike the same chord on comfort, but has better passive noise cancellation.
- Mids track well with the Philips Fidelio X3 headphones.
- Gaming headsets present audio more faithfully, while the mic quality on the ATH-770XCOM is clear and better at capturing upper frequency, while the ATH-GL3 / GDL3 deliver stronger mid-tones.
- Audio-Technica siblings sound more balanced, the IINVICTOR Soturi brings out more directional details due to its brighter signature.
Takeaway: The ATH-GDL3 is a lightweight, comfortable, open-back gaming headset that provides a balanced and clear sound experience. With its detachable mic and elegant design, it's a great option for gamers who value audio quality and comfort.
All
ATH-GDL3
reviews

Manufacturer details
- Type: Open-back dynamic
- Driver Diameter: 45 mm
- Frequency Response: 10 to 35,000 Hz
- Sensitivity: 98 dB/mW
- Impedance: 45 ohms
- Weight (without cable): 220 g (7.8 oz)
- Weight (with mic): 227 g (8.0 oz)
- Cable: Detachable 1.2 m (3.9') with 3.5 mm (1/8") TRRS plug and 3.0 m (9.8') with dual 3.5 mm (1/8") plugs
- Microphone Type: Electret condenser
- Microphone Sensitivity: -43 dB (1 V/Pa, at 1 kHz)
- Microphone Frequency Response: 30 to 20,000 Hz
- Microphone Polar Pattern: Hypercardioid
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
- Audio-Technica's products are known for their sturdy and comfortable build, making them suitable for long listening sessions.
- Audio-Technica offers open-back headphone designs, like the ATH-GDL3, geared toward gamers and audiophiles seeking a wider soundstage, a feature uncommon among gaming headsets.
Select products
ATH-AD500X
- Positioning: Entry-level open-air audiophile headphones designed for comfortable, natural listening.
- Description: Features newly designed 53 mm drivers with CCAW voice coils and a lightweight honeycomb aluminum casing that deliver natural sound with impactful bass and clear vocals. Compared to the higher‐priced models in the lineup, it offers a straightforward open-air design ideal for casual listening and home use without advanced studio-level acoustic refinements.
ATH-TWX9
- Positioning: Premium truly wireless earbuds engineered for dynamic everyday use and active lifestyles.
- Description: Incorporates digital hybrid noise-cancelling technology with customizable ambience control, deep-UV sterilization, and support for Qualcomm Snapdragon Sound to create an immersive 3D sound stage. In contrast to the over-ear studio and monitor designs, they prioritize portability, flexible noise management, and extended battery life to meet the needs of commuters and workout enthusiasts.
ATH-M70x
- Positioning: Professional closed-back monitor headphones tuned for precise mixing and tracking in the studio.
- Description: Uses proprietary 45 mm large-aperture drivers to achieve an extended frequency response from 5 to 40,000 Hz, ensuring balanced and accurate sound reproduction. Compared to the more portable TWX9 and the open-back reference model, they offer enhanced sound isolation and durability for long studio sessions with a focus on critical listening tasks.
ATH-R70xa
- Positioning: Flagship open-back reference headphones crafted for critical studio listening and production.
- Description: Delivers pure, natural sound with a fully open-back design that minimizes internal resonance and distortion, providing precise imaging and quick transient response through meticulously engineered drivers. Compared to the closed-back M70x, the R70xa offers a more spacious and uncolored soundstage ideal for mixing, mastering, and detailed production work in quiet environments.
ATH-AWKG
- Positioning: Ultra-premium audiophile headphones that merge traditional craftsmanship with cutting-edge audio engineering.
- Description: Features an exclusive KUROGAKI wooden housing with a hand-applied lacquer finish and a double air damping system coupled with 53 mm drivers to offer clear, expansive sound quality. In contrast to all other models in the lineup, the AWKG emphasizes luxurious materials and artisanal construction along with advanced acoustics.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
What if you spend more?
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Uses premium materials like carbon fiber, metal, sheep lambskin earpads, and zebra wood faceplates for a luxurious feel, with excellent build quality
- Has a mostly neutral sound signature, with lambskin pads bass response is very good with a tasteful emphasis placed on the sub-bass region, and a decent midrange
- Provides good detail retrieval, resolution, and transparency of sound, the drivers can show plenty of information and micro detail
- A pad swapping system allows changes to sound characteristics, with lambskin pads and breathable fabric pads included
- Comes with a quarter-inch adapter and a 4-pin XLR adapter for use with portable or desktop devices
Product Considerations
- The stock cable is 3 meters long, which is too long for desktop use
- Headband adjustment can be a little stiff to move
- With leather pads, the highs can get slightly sharp
- There is a slight sharpness in the upper treble that might pose a problem for some listeners, using fabric pads can mitigate this
- Weight distribution could be better, there's not enough padding on the headband, and the clamp force is low, this distributes all the weight across the top of the head, which can be bothersome after 40-50 minutes
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs HiFiMan Susvara: Has a similar driver structure
- Vs HiFiMan HE1000 Unveiled: Is close in terms of technical performance like resolution, transient response, soundstage, depth, and openness
- Vs HiFiMan Arya Stealth: Has a better build quality and bass response
Takeaway: The FiiO FT7 is a well-built, comfortable headphone that offers a neutral-leaning-warm sound that can be tailored with different earpads. The FT7 competes with other headphones that cost significantly more, making it a great pick at its price point.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Excellent stereo separation for mixing and monitoring
- Built with aluminum, it has a durable feel
- Designed for reference listening
- Clean, linear, and very detailed mids
Product Considerations
- Sound can be considered somewhat restrained, lacking upper midrange and low to HF 'hype'
- Cloth ear pads may not feel as soft or luxurious as velour pads on some other headphones
- Lacks impact and bite
- Headband padding is uncomfortable
- Single-entry cable is on the right side, which is an unusual placement
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD650: Differences come down to something similar to a full-range studio monitor versus a full-range hifi speaker of equal build quality and similar design, Sennheisers are geared more towards enjoying the brain-pleasing sounds of music, while you probably want to mix with the Neumanns
- Vs Sennheiser HD600/650: The HD600 and HD650 are more comfortable, with a better industrial design than the NDH-30
Takeaway: The Neumann NDH 30 is a tool that can be very helpful for mixing sessions, especially for identifying details in the mid-range of a mix. Its design and build quality also make it a lasting product.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- The Wraith features an all-metal alloy body that feels sturdy and durable
- The earcups feature a rotating mechanism, making it convenient to rest the headphones around the neck
- The design is considered stylish, industrial, and unique
- The suspension headband design distributes weight evenly, making it comfortable to wear for long listening sessions
Product Considerations
- The Wraith's headband adjustment system is not very practical and requires a screwdriver to adjust
- Stock pads may not create the best seal, impacting sound isolation
- The soundstage is intimate, and the resolution is average
- The 2.5mm connectors on the earcups might limit replacement cable options
- Sub-bass can roll off with stock pads
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs HiFiMan Edition XS: The Edition XS has better resolution, clarity, and sub-bass response out of the box, but the Wraith has superior build quality, materials, robustness, and comfort
- Vs Sendy Audio Aiva: The Wraith and Aiva share a similar bass roll-off
- Vs Moondrop Venus: The Moondrop Venus costs slightly more and provides a wider soundstage and more refined sound
Takeaway: The ThieAudio Wraith has excellent build quality and a unique design, making them durable and comfortable for many users. The sound is warm and laid-back, making them suitable for casual listening.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Very comfortable, even for extended listening sessions, due to a suspension strap design and large earcups.
- Soundstage is large and open, creating a concert-like experience with sounds coming from a distance and feeling like a three-dimensional experience.
- Deliver detailed and transparent sound, making it possible to hear all the nuances in music.
- Easy to drive with high sensitivity, though still benefit from a dedicated amplifier.
Product Considerations
- Some reviewers find the bass lacking in punch, preferring a more pronounced bass response.
- Treble might sound a touch bright and fatiguing, depending on the music and amplification.
- Build quality isn't mind-blowing for the price; made of plastic and metal, not always appropriate for long-term durability.
- Stock cable isn't the most wonderful, a little bit stiff.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Audeze LCD-X 2020: Arya Stealth has better resolution and soundstage, but the LCD-X has a more visceral bass and organic sound.
- Vs HiFiMan Ananda: Arya Stealth is better, with more bass, crisper resolution, and a bigger soundstage; everything is sharper, clearer, better resolved, and more refined.
- Vs Sennheiser HD800S: Arya has a slightly V-shaped profile, while the HD800S is smoother with a more neutral tuning; both trade blows equally regarding soundstage, imaging, and resolution.
- Vs HiFiMan Sundara: Arya Stealth has deeper bass response and cleaner sound, while Sundara is warmer and more mid-centric, with darker treble.
- Vs Sendy Audio Peacock: Arya has clearer, more transparent, and more detailed treble, but Peacock's bass is heavier and more impactful, its midrange is fuller and smoother.
- Vs HiFiMan Edition XS: Arya Stealth is more comfortable and feels better built, but both have a similar sound, with the Edition XS having a slightly punchier bass.
Takeaway: The Arya Stealth Magnets are great for listeners looking for exceptional imaging, transparency, and clarity in their music, offering a high-end sound experience with a spacious soundstage. These headphones are a good option for audiophiles who want a detailed and engaging listening experience.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Super lightweight and comfortable to wear.
- Detailed sound and impressive dynamics.
- Wide frequency range.
- High resolution mid and high frequencies.
- Includes two cables and a carrying bag.
Product Considerations
- Headband adjustment is difficult when wearing the headphones.
- Transition between mid and high frequencies is quite pronounced.
- Treble might be a dealbreaker, and cymbals can become overly splashy.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the ATH-R70xa, the ATH-R50x is a more affordable alternative with a lower impedance, making it suitable for low-voltage devices.
- Compared to the ATH-R70xa, the ATH-R50x has more bass quantity and extension.
- Compared to the ATH-R30x, the ATH-R50x has better soundstage and imaging.
Takeaway: The Audio-Technica ATH-R50x are comfortable, lightweight headphones that provide detailed sound, making them great for mixing and mastering. They're also good for everyday use because of their detailed sound and how light they are.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Lightweight design, often described as 'feather-light,' makes it comfortable for long listening sessions
- Open-back design contributes to a wide and spacious soundstage, enabling listeners to discern the placement of instruments in the stereo field
- The cable, with locking mechanisms, is signal independent, meaning it can be plugged into either ear cup without affecting the left/right audio channels
- Good clarity
- Commendable dynamic performance for its price, transients are snappy and well-distinguished, with no hint of muddiness or veil
Product Considerations
- The high impedance of 470 Ohms requires an amplifier or interface to drive the headphones adequately, especially from weaker sources like laptops
- Treble presentation can be slightly uneven or dry, and the headband design lacks flexibility, affecting comfort and fit
- Can be more fatiguing than the original R70x or HD650
- The design is somewhat awkward with limited ear cup articulation, which sometimes prevents a snug fit around my jaw and can cause slight leakage
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser HD650: The tonal balance for this headphone in the mid-range is better than the HD650
- Vs Beyerdynamic DT 880: The spatial presentations are a lot more similar between these two
- Vs Sennheiser HD6XX: If one is into dynamics and wants a weightier, fuller tone, this one is the more natural sounding one
- The presentation here differs from the HD6X0 series, there’s more grain and attack in the midrange and upper frequencies, making it potentially fatiguing if one is accustomed to the HD650’s relaxed tuning
- Reminiscent of the DT770 Pro in terms of midrange linearity, but without the latter’s notorious treble peaks
- Compared to the Moondrop Para, it falls slightly short
Takeaway:
The ATH-R70XA offers a very lightweight design and a wide soundstage for critical listening and enjoying music. It could be a worthwhile purchase for those seeking a comfortable, open-back headphone for studio work or audiophile listening in quiet environments, as long as it is paired with a suitable amplifier.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Very lightweight, making it comfortable for long listening sessions.
- Provides a 'refreshing honesty' and transparency to the sound, making it suitable for critical listening and mixing.
- Has a good amount of clarity and resolution.
- Offers a warmer bass profile with surprising sub-bass extension.
- The design borrows from the DNA of its older siblings, the R50x and R70x.
Product Considerations
- The cable is non-detachable, a compromise to keep the price competitive.
- The ear pads are not very deep, and ears may touch the driver baffle.
- The treble can be a bit bright and harsh, which might require EQ for some users.
- Some reviewers note that the build feels 'cheaper and more plasticky' compared to higher-end models.
- The pads are not as soft or smooth feeling as the higher end R50 and R70 models.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. HiFiMan HE400SE: Better dynamics, and it doesn't sound as compressed.
- Vs. Sennheiser HD 599: Better clarity and detail retrieval.
- Vs. Philips SHP9500: More warmth and better bass.
- Vs. ATH-AD700X: There is no reason to pick the ATH-AD700X over the R30X, unless the sizing characteristics make sense to the user or if the user wants something that sounds wider.
- Vs. R50X: The R50x has more emphasis in the 1 to 2,000 Hertz area, and the upper treble is much more relaxing.
- Vs. R70XA: The R70XA has a more tame treble, so everything just sounds great on it and has been really fun.
Takeaway: The ATH-R30x is a good-value open-back headphone that offers a balanced and detailed sound, making it suitable for both music listening and studio use. Its lightweight design and comfortable fit make it a great choice for those on a budget.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- The HD 560S delivers a flat sound profile that should suit most musical genres
- Very comfortable, with a relatively lightweight design and plenty of plush padding
- Soundstage is exemplary
- Lightweight and provide a nimble feel
- Excels in delivering both vocals and instruments with a remarkable level of clarity and precision
Product Considerations
- Some users might find it a bit dull over time due to its conservative sound signature
- Can be a bit intense at times in the lower treble
- The plastic construction does not scream luxury
- Some loss of texture in the mid-bass, with bass notes of different instruments often sounding the same
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs AKG K702: 560S' sound is going to feel a bit closer, but it may not always be a good thing when trying to hear what is farther off in the distance, for gaming
- Vs Sennheiser HD58X: The 560S is cleaner and more accurate sounding than the HD58X
- Vs Sennheiser HD600: The 560S is more intimate and livelier sounding than the darker HD600
- Vs HIFIMAN Sundara: Compared to the more expensive Hifiman Sundara, the 560S sounds like it lacks detail across the frequency spectrum, except in the sub bass region where the Sundara does not seem to dig as deep
Takeaway: The Sennheiser HD560S is a comfortable headphone with a well-balanced sound, making it a solid choice for both gamers and music enthusiasts looking for neutrality and clarity. It is a versatile headphone for various genres and applications.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Beautifully made with real wooden cups, nice metallic flourishes, and a nice adjustment system
- Very easy to drive from any device due to its 32 ohm impedance and 103 dB sensitivity
- The included hard case is of good quality and protective
- Comfortable to wear for extended sessions due to its light weight (296g) and well-designed headband
- Good soundstage width and overall space, with well-defined instrument separation
Product Considerations
- Some reviewers with larger ears may find the earcups to be too small, causing discomfort
- Lack of extra treble detail and energy means that some percussion misses its snap and shimmer
- The headband size is pretty small, so if your head is on the large side, it might not fit
- Stock earpads are too shallow for some users, causing their ears to touch the inside of the cups
- The midrange can sound stuffy and veiled, lacking clarity and detail compared to some competitors
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Monolith M1060 V2: The Phoenix has better quality treble, but the M1060 has a better quantity of treble and a more neutral sound
- Vs Sennheiser HD560S: The HD560S is a reference headphone designed to be analytical and neutral, while the Phoenix is colored, engaging, rich, and warm
- Vs Sennheiser HD600: The Phoenix is warmer, has deeper sub-bass extension, and a wider soundstage, but the HD600 is more intimate, clear, and detailed in the mids and vocals
- Vs beyerdynamic DT880: The DT880 has a midbass bump and clearer mids, while the Phoenix has better treble extension
- Vs HarmonicDyne Zeus: The Zeus is a warmer set, but the Phoenix is better implemented
- Vs Austrian Audio Hi-X55: The Phoenix has a more environmental feel when it comes to its sub-bass response and a wider soundstage, but the Hi-X55 has a sweeter vocal presentation
Takeaway: The Phoenix offers a warm, rich, and punchy sound signature in a beautifully designed and comfortable package that is easy to drive. It could be a great option for those who enjoy a bass-emphasized sound and listen to genres where extra bass is beneficial.
Video review
Our take on the brand
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.






































.png)










.png)













