Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
Product Strengths
- Wide soundstage, almost HD800S-like, and good imaging, vocals are visceral and real
- Fun, pleasurable, bassy sound signature
- Great value for the price, sounds like it should cost more than it does
Product Considerations
- Fit can be awkward due to the straight wire design without preformed ear hooks, and long connector
- Some units may have an imbalance between left and right sides, so testing is important
- The brass housing is prone to fingerprints and scratches
- Can sound muffled, odd, and unnatural if not paired with a sufficiently powerful amplifier, which it thirsts for current
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Shure 846: The oBravo Cupid has a bigger soundstage, instruments are more clear, and bass is deeper
- Vs Acouston 1965: The oBravo Cupid has deeper bass and a wider soundstage
Takeaway: The oBravo Cupid is a fun-sounding IEM that's great for listening to music. It has a unique sound that many people will enjoy, and is still a good deal for the sound quality.
All
Cupid (Ultimate)
reviews

Manufacturer details
- Housing: Electroplated Brass
- Product Spec: 8 mm planar magnetic tweeter + 6 mm dynamic driver
- Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 40 kHz
- Impedance: 16 Ω
- Sensitivity: 105 dB
- Cable: Newton Ultimate Cable — 2.5 mm balanced silver-plated headphone cable with 3.5 mm adapter
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
- oBravo utilizes a hybrid driver configuration, combining a dynamic driver for lower frequencies with a specialized Air Motion Transformer tweeter for enhanced high-frequency performance.
- They are known for crafting their IEM and headphone housings from premium and often unusual materials such as brass, ceramic, wood, and copper, selected for their acoustic properties and aesthetic appeal.
- oBravo's products often feature a semi-open design that aims to provide a more spacious and speaker-like listening experience compared to traditional closed-back IEMs and headphones.
- They engineer and patent their own proprietary AMT drivers, including the AMT II, continuously striving to improve the performance and efficiency of their unique tweeter technology.
Select products
CUPID (ULTIMATE)
- Positioning: The entry-level earphone designed for affordability and portability.
- Description: Features a unique Planar Magnetic Driver that brings clear, bright highs and engaging mids in a simple package. Compared to the Air Motion Transformer models, it offers dynamic sound at a lower price point, ideal for users who seek portable performance without the complexity of higher-end builds.
EAMT-2C
- Positioning: A mid-range earphone focused on miniaturization and balanced full-range performance.
- Description: Features exclusive miniaturization and Air Motion Transformer technology that delivers rich spatial sound and precise bass clarity. When compared to the simpler CUPID (ULTIMATE) and the more refined EAMT-1C, it offers a balanced mix of performance and cost‐efficiency for everyday critical listening.
EAMT-1C
- Positioning: A higher mid-range earphone tailored for audiophile-quality listening on the go.
- Description: Features refined Air Motion Transformer tweeter and single crystal oxygen-free copper cable that enhance realism and warmth. Compared to the EAMT-2C, it provides a more engaging, full-bodied sound while still staying below the flagship models in terms of price and imaging sophistication.
RA-C (21.5)
- Positioning: A premium earphone model aimed at delivering lifelike spatial imaging and detailed sound.
- Description: Uses advanced materials like pure silver, gold-plated silver, and oxygen-free copper wiring that produce crisp highs, warm mids, and deep bass with precise spatial cues. In comparison to the lower-priced models, it offers superior audio balance and critical listening performance.
RA-C-CU (21.5)
- Positioning: The flagship earphone focused on the highest fidelity and premium build in the lineup.
- Description: Takes advanced material construction further by providing extremely nuanced imaging and groundbreaking sound clarity through refined use of high-grade conductors. When benchmarked against all other models, it delivers top-tier performance.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
Used
oBravo
What if you spend more?
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Offers excellent midrange resolution, highlighting subtle details in instruments
- Features a safe yet exciting U-shaped tuning suitable for all genres
- Presents a dynamic and exciting sound signature, clear vocal performances, and a resolving staging performance
- The included cable is of high quality and features interchangeable plugs
- Has great audio reproduction accuracy and consistent audio delivery
Product Considerations
- The upper treble may be a little exaggerated for some listeners
- The shell is larger than average for a universal IEM, which may cause fit issues for some
- Stock ear tips are just okay
- Bass resolution could be better
- Does not have an integrated microphone, so a standalone mic is needed to take calls
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Monarch MKII: The MKIII has increased richness in its midrange and an upper treble exaggeration, offering a slightly U-shaped signature compared to the MkII's balanced profile
- Vs. Symphonium Helios: MkIII's midbass body contrasts Helios' dipped lower mids, MkIII has better overall resolution, but a more exaggerated treble
- Vs. 64 Audio U4s: The MkIII is better tuned compared to the U4s, with the U4s having a thicker midrange and weightier timbre
- Vs. MOONDROP x Crinacle DUSK: The THIEAUDIO have a more detailed treble range
- Vs. MOONDROP Blessing 3: The THIEAUDIO have a more elevated bass range
- Vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle ZERO: RED: The THIEAUDIO do a better job blocking out external noise and leak less audio
Takeaway: The Monarch MKIII is a well-tuned IEM that is great for all kinds of music and has excellent technical performance. If one is looking for a high-end IEM with a versatile sound, this could be a great choice.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Agreeable, natural sonic signature
- Sounds very good, feels tough, and comes with most of the accessories needed
- Precision-milled housings follow the company’s IE 900, IE 200, and IE 300 models, shape wise, and therefore comfort wise
- A well-engineered product that sounds excellent
- Measured performance closely aligns with a headphone preference curve, so it sounds excellent
Product Considerations
- Basic silicone eartips that don’t fit everyone
- The MMCX connector is an atypical version that will not work with most other cables
- The texture of the AMLOY-ZR01 finish is not everyone's favorite to wear
- Treble is a bit subdued with cymbals resolving reasonably well, but way behind the IE 900
- Stock tips that come with Sennheiser's earphones are poorly designed; the silicone lacks rigidity to the point of which it more often than not collapses against the ear when one inserts the IEMs, thus making a proper seal very difficult to achieve
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs IE 900: The easier-to-drive IE 900 have a tighter, less thumpy low end and a leaner midrange, which results in better separation between the two, and also in better midrange resolution and clarity
- Vs IE 900: The IE 900 also have a much superior (perceived) treble extension and resolution, and a much wider soundstage
- Vs Final E5000: The final E5000 offer fuller voices, more bass, but less treble than the IE 600, and a narrower stage
- Vs Meze ADVAR: The ADVAR's sound is taller than the IE 600, the latter has more width, and imaging is tight and well-produced in both IEMs, with the IE 600 edging out the ADVAR by the slightest of margins
Takeaway: The IE 600 is a great set of earphones that will appeal to listeners owing to their punchy tonality and is pretty much unparalleled in their class. With the IE 600, listeners get undistorted audio and great isolation, and durable materials that will always sound good.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Very comfortable, suitable for long listening sessions and wearing in bed, due to its small size, lightweight design, and ergonomic shape
- Delivers a neutral and natural sound presentation, making it appropriate for stage and studio monitoring
- Excellent sound isolation, effectively blocking out external noise
- Good detail retrieval and resolution, presenting information accurately
Product Considerations
- May sound a bit boring or dull if one is looking for a more dynamic and engaging sound with more bass and treble emphasis
- The plastic build quality may not feel as premium as some other IEMs
- Requires a bit more power to drive it to sound best
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Mach 60 has a more neutral presentation, while ADV M512D is more elevated in the mids and treble and has more bass impact
- Mach 60 is more neutral and natural, while Unique Melody MEST delivers excellent detail and resolution
Takeaway: The Westone Mach 60 is a comfortable and well-built in-ear monitor that delivers a neutral and natural sound, great for musicians and audiophiles looking for an accurate representation of their music. It is a great tool as a stage monitor and comfortable for long listening sessions.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Convincingly balanced sound performance with a slight bass emphasis
- A wide and deep soundstage
- High-quality build, using a titanium housing, making it feel robust
- Good clarity and sparkle in the highs, with a natural and airy treble that feels relaxed
- Comes with a decorative, braided balanced cable made of silver wire, with interchangeable ends
Product Considerations
- A larger earbud which may affect the fit for some users
- A slight emphasis in the bass area and a sober sound, which may be a matter of taste
- Semi-open design is less isolating
- High frequencies might be too elevated for some
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs FiiO FH5s: Better bass texture, transparency, resolution, and treble definition, and sounds more cohesive and balanced
- Vs FiiO FH7: Better design, a better carrying case, more accessories, better build quality, better refinement, more resolution, transparency, treble definition, dynamism, and a wider and deeper soundstage
- Vs Kinera Norn: Better mid-range definition, tonality, and transparency, the Norn has a more V-shaped sound signature with splashy and aggressive treble
Takeaway: The FiiO FH9 is a well-crafted IEM with a balanced sound signature and customizable options, making it enjoyable for a wide range of listeners. It has excellent detail retrieval and a wide soundstage that immerses the listener in the music.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Build quality is incredible, described as top-notch and sensational
- Sound is considered one of the best for earbuds, with attention to detail that makes it an audiophile earbud
- Balanced sound with clean and clinical top end, realistic voices, and neutral bass that is not lacking
- Great imaging and wide soundstage, almost impossible to do
- The Cupid is warm, inviting, and a dynamic earphone with top-notch staging, making it worthy of its price tag
Product Considerations
- Only the cables changed, according to one reviewer
- Brain has to get used to hearing these
- Some reviewers experienced an imbalance between the left and right sides, requiring testing and potential replacement
- Fit can be awkward and uncomfortable due to the straight wire design and long connector
- The Cupid is amplifier dependent, and without sufficient current, they sound muffled, odd, and unnatural
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Shure 846: Deeper bass and wider soundstage
- Vs Acoustune 1965: Deeper bass and wider soundstage
Takeaway: The oBravo Cupid (Basic) offers high-quality sound and exceptional build quality, making for a very enjoyable listening experience. It is a great option for those seeking audiophile-grade sound in a portable earbud format, and who value a very portable device.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Sound quality is significantly better than Shure 846, with a bigger soundstage, clearer instruments, and deeper bass
- Good soundstage and imaging, sometimes described as holographic or HD800S-like for width
- Fun and pleasurable listening experience, especially with elevated bass that is not bloated
Product Considerations
- Amplifier dependent, the Obravo Cupid requires sufficient current to avoid sounding muffled or unnatural
- Fit can be problematic due to the shape and the straight wire without a pre-formed earhook, leading to discomfort if moving around
- Proprietary locking MMCX connector might make finding aftermarket cables difficult
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to Shure 846, the Obravo Cupid has better sound quality, a bigger soundstage, clearer instruments, and deeper bass
- Compared to Final Audio B2, the Obravo Cupid is more detailed with more treble sparkle, air, and a wider soundstage, especially for EDM and pop music
- Compared to Empire Ears Legend X, the Obravo Cupid does not have as deep bass
Takeaway: The Obravo Cupid offers great sound for the price, especially for those who like a fun, bassy sound signature and a wide soundstage. If one is looking for IEMs that can provide an engaging and enjoyable listening experience, the Cupid is a worthwhile option.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Sound signature is likely to be palatable for a wide range of people at its price point.
- Good emphasis in the upper midrange, decent timbre, good resolution, the upper midrange is upfront with the vocals, nice details, and it works well with a smooth treble.
- Very smooth treble and the absence of sibilance.
- Good dynamic bass that's nicely textured and has a decent rumble.
- Imaging is accurate.
Product Considerations
- The Truth Ear Nova does not sound better or more balanced than the Hexa, since the reviewer prefers a more balanced sound signature.
- Nova is not a thick-sounding IEM, it's quite thin.
- The midrange is chiefly defined by a cavernous suckout in the low-midrange.
- Soundstage is a little narrower than preferred.
- Shell size may be slightly large for smaller ears.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Moondrop Variations: Nova is significantly cheaper and close enough in performance that one should save money and go for Nova.
- Vs. Truthear Hexa: Nova easily has a smoother treble presentation, has more dynamic bass, and is more ergonomic, but Hexa has one of the best midranges in this price tier.
- Vs. Truthear Zero: RED: Zero: RED beats Nova almost across the board in tuning and simply sounds more normal.
Takeaway: The Truth Ear Nova is commendable for achieving its tuning at its price point, especially for those looking for a V-shaped presentation or Harman-esque kind of sound signature. If the Harman IE target is to one's liking, Nova is probably as safe a choice as any of the other Harman options out there.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Great build quality and a generous accessory set
- Decently wide soundstage for closed-back IEMs, presenting a three-dimensional space for instrument placement
- Strong technical performance for the price, with standout resolution
Product Considerations
- The lack of a lip on the nozzle makes it impossible to use even slightly-larger-than-perfect eartips, as they just fall off
- Treble is a tad brighter than preferred, which some may find fatiguing over time
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Thieaudio Legacy 3, the Legacy 4 has faster and more detailed bass, more detailed and extended treble, and better imaging and instrument separation
- Compared to the Moondrop KXXS, the Legacy 4 has a solid technical edge in resolution and imaging
Takeaway: The Thieaudio Legacy 4 is a competent earphone that offers a clean, clear rendition of music with excellent resolution and detail retrieval. It is enjoyable across various genres and provides a high-quality listening experience for audiophiles.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Detailed and clean sound, putting plenty of micro-details on the foreground
- Good build quality and comfortable design
- Swappable audio plugs included
- Tuning switches featured
- Open and wide soundstage
Product Considerations
- Treble can be a bit sharp and metallic sounding
- A dedicated DAP, Bluetooth dongle, or external DAC/Amp is needed to shine
- Below-average noise isolation due to its semi-open nature
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Approaches the FiiO FH7 closely, but is not exactly as punchy and engaging when bass notes are coming to play, FH7 has a better midrange rendition
- The FH5s gives a harder edge to treble notes, but at the same time creates a wider and more spacious soundstage
- The FiiO FD5 emphasizes warmth, smoothness, and a lush sound with prominent bass and midrange, where the FH5S has a more textured midrange, and a cleaner bass with less emphasis
Takeaway: The FiiO FH5S provides an outstanding unboxing experience and impressive features, along with a clear sound. The IEM allows for long listening sessions.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Questions? Ask the brand's dealers.
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.
























.png)






















