Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
Product Strengths
- Elsa is very comfortable inside the ear due to its ergonomic design
- Better definition, better resolution, and slightly better clarity
- Has a bigger stage in every direction
- Better sub-bass reach
- Is not hard to drive
Product Considerations
- The stock cable is disappointing and looks cheap
- Accessories and packaging are generic
- The sub-bass can be hollow and thin with little to no impact, according to one review
- The provided cable is a bit stiff
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Dunu SA6, Elsa has a bigger stage, more mature tuning, and cleaner sound
- Compared to the Campfire Audio Andromeda V3, Elsa has very good sub-bass extension with no bleed at all, better consistency and balance, and the treble is extended
Takeaway: The Shozy Elsa is a comfortable and ergonomic IEM with good clarity and a clean sound. It's a great option for those who want a balanced and enjoyable listening experience.
All
Elsa
reviews

Manufacturer details
- Drivers: 5 × Knowles proprietary balanced armature drivers
- Crossover: 3-way
- Impedance: 15 Ω @ 1 kHz
- Sensitivity: 105 dB SPL @ 1 mW
- Frequency Response: 20 Hz – 20 kHz
- Noise Isolation: –26 dB
- Termination: 0.78 mm 2-pin
- Connector Options: 3.5 mm, 2.5 mm, 4.4 mm
- Construction: Hand-crafted medical-grade resin, individually tuned
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
- Shozy IEMs are noted for their comfortable fit, often described as ergonomic and suitable for long listening sessions or even sleeping with them in.
Select products
MAGMA
- Positioning: A universal in-ear monitor offering balanced sound and clarity.
- Description: Delivers articulate mids with a tribrid design that emphasizes a wide soundstage and clear detail. In comparison to the more refined features in Elsa, Rouge, and Black Hole, provides steady performance at an accessible price point.
CERES
- Positioning: A mid-range in-ear monitor aimed at balanced performance and improved treble.
- Description: Offers better treble, staging, and imaging with its dynamic and balanced armature configuration that enhances instrument separation.
ELSA
- Positioning: An award-winning CIEM designed for high resolution and precise sound reproduction.
- Description: Provides detailed clarity and immersive sonic precision with a design that has earned critical acclaim. Compared to the entry-level Magma and the balanced approach of Ceres, offers enhanced technical sophistication for users aiming for studio-quality performance in compact form.
ROUGE
- Positioning: A premium in-ear monitor noted for its artistic, one-off design and hybrid driver setup.
- Description: Features a hand-painted finish paired with a hybrid configuration of one dynamic driver and two balanced armatures, delivering clear dynamics and an immersive soundstage. In comparison to Elsa's award-winning precision and Black Hole's advanced engineering, Rouge stands out with its unique aesthetic appeal and tailored sound signature.
BLACK HOLE
- Positioning: A high-end in-ear monitor engineered to deliver ultimate realism and advanced performance.
- Description: Uses patented acoustic technologies and meticulous tuning, resulting in an expansive, natural staging and extremely low distortion. Compared to Magma, Ceres, Elsa, and Rouge, Black Hole represents the flagship model for users seeking the pinnacle of in-ear monitor engineering.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
Used
Shozy
What if you spend more?
Product Strengths
- Impressive technical performance, clarity, detail retrieval, and resolution due to its planar magnetic drivers.
- Features a new, comfortable, and ergonomic shell design that's also lightweight and durable.
- Includes two upgraded Time Stream Metal cables, providing both 3.5mm and 4.4mm terminations.
- Delivers a strong, extended bass response, with texture and speed, plus a nimble, airy top-end.
- Exhibits a spacious, wide, and holographic soundstage with good imaging and instrument separation.
Product Considerations
- Lower sensitivity might require a dedicated DAP or amplifier for optimal performance, and can sound anemic when paired with just a phone.
- Can be sensitive to source pairings, warmer DACs might wash out the mids and some pairings may bring out sibilance.
- Stock tips might not provide the best seal for everyone, and the stock tip selection is poor.
- Silicone eartips can make the treble sound harsh.
- The mirror-finished stainless steel faceplate is prone to fingerprints and smudges.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Campfire Audio Bonneville: Astrolith has superior mids, clarity, detail and transparency, and better treble extension, articulation, and overall resolution.
- Vs 64 Audio Volür: Astrolith offers bigger bass and a more exciting presentation, as well as faster and more resolving sound, but Volür is more accurate overall.
- Vs. Oriolus Monachaa: Astrolith has a faster and more controlled bass with better texture, a more natural and realistic midrange with a fabulous timbre.
- Vs. Elysian Acoustic Labs Annihilator: Astrolith delivers a more robust and organic mid-range with realistic and natural timbre and more defined lower mids.
Takeaway: The Astrolith is a technically impressive IEM with a comfortable design that delivers a powerful and detailed sound. It could be a great pick for listeners who want high-end sound that can play all kinds of music well.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Captures the sound of the original Svanar, with a balanced tuning emphasizing bass and treble while maintaining the mids
- Incredible imaging performance, offering a wide, well-rounded, three-dimensional soundstage with excellent positioning and separation—highly competitive, even compared to non-TWS IEMs under $1000
- Has an R2R DAC which permits unreachable technical performance
- Very light and comfortable
- Excellent connectivity and usability
Product Considerations
- LDAC connectivity issues with invasive intermittence and noise cutting
- ANC and Transparency mode aren’t very useful and lack dynamic, delivering leaner dynamic, less musicality
- Plastic build might not be most durable if dropped
- High-frequencies are quite sensible to the source, making it one of the least forgiving TWS
- Hiss is also present
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- The Svanar Wireless is punchier, with better bass detail and imaging, and a wider soundstage, while the Final ZE8000 has a warmer, more neutral sound
- The Svanar Wireless has stronger imaging performance, a wider soundstage, and a better balance between separation and cohesion
- The Svanar Wireless is superior in technicalities and tonal balance, as well as timbre and tone naturalness, and ultimately musicality
- The Svanar Wireless' soundstage is taller and wider but not as deep, since clarity isn’t as sharp and clean, silence being more "noisy"
- The Svanar Wireless has better sound and performs better technically
- The Sony TWS has bloated bass that overwhelms everything else; in comparison, the soundstage and treble performance of the Svanar Wireless is miles ahead, presenting a much more detailed, natural, and sophisticated kind of sound
Takeaway: The Svanar Wireless sounds impressive for wireless earbuds, and it has great connectivity and features. For those seeking high-end wireless sound, these are worth considering.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Praised for its beautiful design
- Very comfortable, almost expected from an IEM based on resin
- Easy to drive due to its low impedance and high sensitivity
- Provides a lot of clarity
- Has a very natural tonality, even with balanced drivers
Product Considerations
- Its design might be too fragile and prone to scratches
- May lack impact and slam for music with a lot of low-octave focus
- Some amplifiers might not synergize well, needing experimentation
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Moondrop variations, the Cadenza is preferred for its handling of transitions
Takeaway: The Cadenza is a beautiful IEM with great clarity that's also comfortable to wear. It is an easy to drive IEM, with great potential to provide enjoyable listening sessions.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Versatile sound signature, going from bassy to neutral with the use of included tuning modules
- Excellent bass response with a dynamic driver, providing strong texture, deep extension, and impact
- Very good treble extension, air, and sparkle for detail retrieval without harshness
- Expertly captures the 64 Audio character of balancing pro audio sensibilities and a more audiophile-friendly sound
- Comfortable and durable design, with a lightweight anodized aluminum shell and well-thought-out accessories
Product Considerations
- Imaging and instrument separation are decent, but not standout for the price range
- Mid-range may sound a bit thin to some, with a more relaxed upper mid-range that results in vocals being a little bit on the husky side
- The nozzle doesn’t have lip holder and is a bit problematic
- Isolation isn't exceptional due to the apex module
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs 64 Audio Neo: U4S is preferred due to the U4S being the cheaper IEM
- Vs Thieaudio Monarch MkII: The Monarch is comparatively lean sounding
- Vs 64 Audio U6T: U6T is a little more neutral overall with a stronger technicality, but the U4S injects a little more fun into the sound
- Vs Campfire Audio Andromeda Emerald Sea: The U4S offers a more natural mid-range presentation
- Vs 64 Audio Nio: The U4s effectively undercuts the Nio by a third of the price with comparable sound quality
- Vs Custom Art Fibae 5: If you want technicalities and details, Fibae 5 is superior, if you want a very capable yet slightly musical and mainstream IEM, opt for the U4s
Takeaway:
The 64 Audio U4s is a well-rounded IEM that offers a fun and engaging sound signature with the ability to customize the bass response. With its comfortable fit and excellent build quality, it's a great option for those looking for a versatile and enjoyable listening experience.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Delivers a natural and realistic sound representation without artificially boosting frequencies or dynamics
- Offers a spacious soundstage, particularly in width, creating a three-dimensional listening experience
- Unique semi-open design creates a breathable, effortless, and natural physical sensation, unlike closed-back IEMs
- Provides exceptional clarity, detail retrieval, and transparency, competing with higher-priced IEMs
- Good build quality with an all-metal body that feels premium and sturdy
Product Considerations
- Lacks significant sound isolation due to its open-back design, making it unsuitable for noisy environments
- Bass response may not satisfy bass-heavy music enthusiasts as it is not particularly boosted, voluminous, or slammy
- Stock cable and included accessories are basic and do not match the IEM's premium price point
- May sound a bit dull or monotonous to listeners accustomed to fun, colored sound signatures
- The open design exposes the drivers, raising concerns about potential damage from moisture or debris
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Compared to the Zen, the Black Hole has more transparency, is more attacking, and offers better detail retrieval, but the Zen has more bass
- Compared to the Letshuoer Tape, the Black Hole offers a wider range open-feel and better imaging, while the Letshuoer Tape offers better tonality at the treble
- Compared to the Audeze LCD-i3, the Black Hole offers a more comfortable, soft, and easy-going experience
- Compared to the Audeze iSINE 20, the Black Hole has a natural flow, in comparison to the more condensed feel of the iSINE 20 imaging
Takeaway: The Shozy Black Hole is a unique IEM that delivers exceptionally clear and natural sound with a spacious presentation, creating an immersive listening experience. An ideal choice for someone seeking an IEM that sounds great, has exceptional detail, and does not isolate the listener from their surroundings.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Offers excellent midrange resolution, highlighting subtle details in instruments
- Features a safe yet exciting U-shaped tuning suitable for all genres
- Presents a dynamic and exciting sound signature, clear vocal performances, and a resolving staging performance
- The included cable is of high quality and features interchangeable plugs
- Has great audio reproduction accuracy and consistent audio delivery
Product Considerations
- The upper treble may be a little exaggerated for some listeners
- The shell is larger than average for a universal IEM, which may cause fit issues for some
- Stock ear tips are just okay
- Bass resolution could be better
- Does not have an integrated microphone, so a standalone mic is needed to take calls
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Monarch MKII: The MKIII has increased richness in its midrange and an upper treble exaggeration, offering a slightly U-shaped signature compared to the MkII's balanced profile
- Vs. Symphonium Helios: MkIII's midbass body contrasts Helios' dipped lower mids, MkIII has better overall resolution, but a more exaggerated treble
- Vs. 64 Audio U4s: The MkIII is better tuned compared to the U4s, with the U4s having a thicker midrange and weightier timbre
- Vs. MOONDROP x Crinacle DUSK: The THIEAUDIO have a more detailed treble range
- Vs. MOONDROP Blessing 3: The THIEAUDIO have a more elevated bass range
- Vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle ZERO: RED: The THIEAUDIO do a better job blocking out external noise and leak less audio
Takeaway: The Monarch MKIII is a well-tuned IEM that is great for all kinds of music and has excellent technical performance. If one is looking for a high-end IEM with a versatile sound, this could be a great choice.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Agreeable, natural sonic signature
- Sounds very good, feels tough, and comes with most of the accessories needed
- Precision-milled housings follow the company’s IE 900, IE 200, and IE 300 models, shape wise, and therefore comfort wise
- A well-engineered product that sounds excellent
- Measured performance closely aligns with a headphone preference curve, so it sounds excellent
Product Considerations
- Basic silicone eartips that don’t fit everyone
- The MMCX connector is an atypical version that will not work with most other cables
- The texture of the AMLOY-ZR01 finish is not everyone's favorite to wear
- Treble is a bit subdued with cymbals resolving reasonably well, but way behind the IE 900
- Stock tips that come with Sennheiser's earphones are poorly designed; the silicone lacks rigidity to the point of which it more often than not collapses against the ear when one inserts the IEMs, thus making a proper seal very difficult to achieve
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs IE 900: The easier-to-drive IE 900 have a tighter, less thumpy low end and a leaner midrange, which results in better separation between the two, and also in better midrange resolution and clarity
- Vs IE 900: The IE 900 also have a much superior (perceived) treble extension and resolution, and a much wider soundstage
- Vs Final E5000: The final E5000 offer fuller voices, more bass, but less treble than the IE 600, and a narrower stage
- Vs Meze ADVAR: The ADVAR's sound is taller than the IE 600, the latter has more width, and imaging is tight and well-produced in both IEMs, with the IE 600 edging out the ADVAR by the slightest of margins
Takeaway: The IE 600 is a great set of earphones that will appeal to listeners owing to their punchy tonality and is pretty much unparalleled in their class. With the IE 600, listeners get undistorted audio and great isolation, and durable materials that will always sound good.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Very comfortable, suitable for long listening sessions and wearing in bed, due to its small size, lightweight design, and ergonomic shape
- Delivers a neutral and natural sound presentation, making it appropriate for stage and studio monitoring
- Excellent sound isolation, effectively blocking out external noise
- Good detail retrieval and resolution, presenting information accurately
Product Considerations
- May sound a bit boring or dull if one is looking for a more dynamic and engaging sound with more bass and treble emphasis
- The plastic build quality may not feel as premium as some other IEMs
- Requires a bit more power to drive it to sound best
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Mach 60 has a more neutral presentation, while ADV M512D is more elevated in the mids and treble and has more bass impact
- Mach 60 is more neutral and natural, while Unique Melody MEST delivers excellent detail and resolution
Takeaway: The Westone Mach 60 is a comfortable and well-built in-ear monitor that delivers a neutral and natural sound, great for musicians and audiophiles looking for an accurate representation of their music. It is a great tool as a stage monitor and comfortable for long listening sessions.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Convincingly balanced sound performance with a slight bass emphasis
- A wide and deep soundstage
- High-quality build, using a titanium housing, making it feel robust
- Good clarity and sparkle in the highs, with a natural and airy treble that feels relaxed
- Comes with a decorative, braided balanced cable made of silver wire, with interchangeable ends
Product Considerations
- A larger earbud which may affect the fit for some users
- A slight emphasis in the bass area and a sober sound, which may be a matter of taste
- Semi-open design is less isolating
- High frequencies might be too elevated for some
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs FiiO FH5s: Better bass texture, transparency, resolution, and treble definition, and sounds more cohesive and balanced
- Vs FiiO FH7: Better design, a better carrying case, more accessories, better build quality, better refinement, more resolution, transparency, treble definition, dynamism, and a wider and deeper soundstage
- Vs Kinera Norn: Better mid-range definition, tonality, and transparency, the Norn has a more V-shaped sound signature with splashy and aggressive treble
Takeaway: The FiiO FH9 is a well-crafted IEM with a balanced sound signature and customizable options, making it enjoyable for a wide range of listeners. It has excellent detail retrieval and a wide soundstage that immerses the listener in the music.
Video review
Our take on the brand
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.


















.png)










.png)











