Note that this is a discontinued product. You may want to visit the brand's page here to browse their newer products.
What reviewers think
Bloggers and YouTubers have tried this product—so we've summarized their strongest opinions below. Links to full reviews follow.
Product Strengths
- Small and lightweight design makes them comfortable for long listening sessions, even for sleeping.
- Delivers a well-balanced bass quality.
- Good sound with decent isolation using memory foam ear tips, with audio that is delivered consistently with a stable fit.
Product Considerations
- Stock cable is of poor quality, tangles easily, and feels cheap, so reviewers recommend replacing it.
- Recessed MMCX connectors make it difficult to find suitable replacement cables.
- Stock ear tips often fail to provide a proper seal, leading to inconsistent bass response.
- The 'dual tuning' bass adjustment feature via nozzle hole is considered a gimmick and can cause channel imbalance.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs IE 600: IE 200 has less treble and is less detailed, but the IE200 is smoother.
- Vs Moondrop Kato: IE200 is smoother, lacks harshness, and has solid timbre, whereas the Kato can be aggressive.
- IE 200 is better than the IE300 in terms of tuning.
Takeaway: The IE 200 is comfortable and has a good sound signature for a reasonable price. With a few upgrades like the cable and ear tips, the IE 200 could be a great option.
All
IE 200
reviews

Manufacturer details
- Transducer principle: dynamic
- Transducer size: 7mm
- Frequency response: 6 Hz – 20,000 Hz
- Ear coupling: Ear canal
Brand highlights
Taking a step back to look at reviewers' thoughts of the brand's entire lineup—not just this product—what stands out most is the following:
Select products
HD-559
- Positioning: Entry-level design focused on affordability and everyday listening needs.
- Description: Offers clear sound and comfortable design with a straightforward acoustic setup suitable for small rooms and casual music enjoyment. Compared to the HD-560S and HD-660S2, its basic performance and limited feature set make it a better fit for buyers with lower budgets and simple functionality needs.
HD-560S
- Positioning: Mid-tier model balancing cost and improved technical performance.
- Description: Delivers enhanced clarity and precision with a refined tuning approach that benefits home or studio use. When compared with the HD-559 and HD-660S2, it provides better sound detail while remaining accessible for buyers seeking moderate cost and practical functionality.
HD-660S2
- Positioning: Mid to high-level design crafted for a richer and fuller sound experience.
- Description: Offers a warmer sound signature with improved bass impact and a wider soundstage. Relative to the HD-560S and HD-800S, its technical enhancements and superior build quality justify the higher investment for users aiming for more refined performance without reaching the premium flagship tier.
HD-800 S
- Positioning: High-end open-back design intended for detailed, analytical listening applications.
- Description: Provides natural, transparent sound with a wide soundstage and precise imaging that benefits critical listening in controlled environments. Compared to the HD-660S2 and HD-820, it emphasizes technical accuracy and spatial detail.
HD-820
- Positioning: Premium closed-back design engineered for reference-class listening in isolated environments.
- Description: Features a unique closed-back design that merges open headphone sound characteristics with enhanced bass warmth and improved isolation, suited for quiet and nearfield environments. In comparison with the HD-800 S, it prioritizes sound isolation and versatility over the expansive open-air presentation.
Our take on the brand
Look inside the brand
Our interview with the brand
What are two key technological innovations or strong opinions that differ you from other brands?
What's your approach to customer support?
What are your favorite tracks for showcasing the strength of your products?
What other products pair best with yours?
Used
Sennheiser
What if you spend more?
Product Strengths
- Agreeable, natural sonic signature
- Sounds very good, feels tough, and comes with most of the accessories needed
- Precision-milled housings follow the company’s IE 900, IE 200, and IE 300 models, shape wise, and therefore comfort wise
- A well-engineered product that sounds excellent
- Measured performance closely aligns with a headphone preference curve, so it sounds excellent
Product Considerations
- Basic silicone eartips that don’t fit everyone
- The MMCX connector is an atypical version that will not work with most other cables
- The texture of the AMLOY-ZR01 finish is not everyone's favorite to wear
- Treble is a bit subdued with cymbals resolving reasonably well, but way behind the IE 900
- Stock tips that come with Sennheiser's earphones are poorly designed; the silicone lacks rigidity to the point of which it more often than not collapses against the ear when one inserts the IEMs, thus making a proper seal very difficult to achieve
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs IE 900: The easier-to-drive IE 900 have a tighter, less thumpy low end and a leaner midrange, which results in better separation between the two, and also in better midrange resolution and clarity
- Vs IE 900: The IE 900 also have a much superior (perceived) treble extension and resolution, and a much wider soundstage
- Vs Final E5000: The final E5000 offer fuller voices, more bass, but less treble than the IE 600, and a narrower stage
- Vs Meze ADVAR: The ADVAR's sound is taller than the IE 600, the latter has more width, and imaging is tight and well-produced in both IEMs, with the IE 600 edging out the ADVAR by the slightest of margins
Takeaway: The IE 600 is a great set of earphones that will appeal to listeners owing to their punchy tonality and is pretty much unparalleled in their class. With the IE 600, listeners get undistorted audio and great isolation, and durable materials that will always sound good.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our summary
Product Strengths
- Offers excellent midrange resolution, highlighting subtle details in instruments
- Features a safe yet exciting U-shaped tuning suitable for all genres
- Presents a dynamic and exciting sound signature, clear vocal performances, and a resolving staging performance
- The included cable is of high quality and features interchangeable plugs
- Has great audio reproduction accuracy and consistent audio delivery
Product Considerations
- The upper treble may be a little exaggerated for some listeners
- The shell is larger than average for a universal IEM, which may cause fit issues for some
- Stock ear tips are just okay
- Bass resolution could be better
- Does not have an integrated microphone, so a standalone mic is needed to take calls
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Monarch MKII: The MKIII has increased richness in its midrange and an upper treble exaggeration, offering a slightly U-shaped signature compared to the MkII's balanced profile
- Vs. Symphonium Helios: MkIII's midbass body contrasts Helios' dipped lower mids, MkIII has better overall resolution, but a more exaggerated treble
- Vs. 64 Audio U4s: The MkIII is better tuned compared to the U4s, with the U4s having a thicker midrange and weightier timbre
- Vs. MOONDROP x Crinacle DUSK: The THIEAUDIO have a more detailed treble range
- Vs. MOONDROP Blessing 3: The THIEAUDIO have a more elevated bass range
- Vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle ZERO: RED: The THIEAUDIO do a better job blocking out external noise and leak less audio
Takeaway: The Monarch MKIII is a well-tuned IEM that is great for all kinds of music and has excellent technical performance. If one is looking for a high-end IEM with a versatile sound, this could be a great choice.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Very comfortable, suitable for long listening sessions and wearing in bed, due to its small size, lightweight design, and ergonomic shape
- Delivers a neutral and natural sound presentation, making it appropriate for stage and studio monitoring
- Excellent sound isolation, effectively blocking out external noise
- Good detail retrieval and resolution, presenting information accurately
Product Considerations
- May sound a bit boring or dull if one is looking for a more dynamic and engaging sound with more bass and treble emphasis
- The plastic build quality may not feel as premium as some other IEMs
- Requires a bit more power to drive it to sound best
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Mach 60 has a more neutral presentation, while ADV M512D is more elevated in the mids and treble and has more bass impact
- Mach 60 is more neutral and natural, while Unique Melody MEST delivers excellent detail and resolution
Takeaway: The Westone Mach 60 is a comfortable and well-built in-ear monitor that delivers a neutral and natural sound, great for musicians and audiophiles looking for an accurate representation of their music. It is a great tool as a stage monitor and comfortable for long listening sessions.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Product Strengths
- Convincingly balanced sound performance with a slight bass emphasis
- A wide and deep soundstage
- High-quality build, using a titanium housing, making it feel robust
- Good clarity and sparkle in the highs, with a natural and airy treble that feels relaxed
- Comes with a decorative, braided balanced cable made of silver wire, with interchangeable ends
Product Considerations
- A larger earbud which may affect the fit for some users
- A slight emphasis in the bass area and a sober sound, which may be a matter of taste
- Semi-open design is less isolating
- High frequencies might be too elevated for some
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs FiiO FH5s: Better bass texture, transparency, resolution, and treble definition, and sounds more cohesive and balanced
- Vs FiiO FH7: Better design, a better carrying case, more accessories, better build quality, better refinement, more resolution, transparency, treble definition, dynamism, and a wider and deeper soundstage
- Vs Kinera Norn: Better mid-range definition, tonality, and transparency, the Norn has a more V-shaped sound signature with splashy and aggressive treble
Takeaway: The FiiO FH9 is a well-crafted IEM with a balanced sound signature and customizable options, making it enjoyable for a wide range of listeners. It has excellent detail retrieval and a wide soundstage that immerses the listener in the music.
Video review
Our take on the brand
What competes at this price?
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Excellent sound quality with depth, great soundstage, and crisp, clean elements
- Active noise cancellation is a useful addition and blocks out rumbling and background chatter
- The earbuds themselves are smaller compared to the previous version
- Touch controls are responsive and easier to use than the old version, and customizable
Product Considerations
- Continuous battery life with ANC on is quite short at around 4 hours
- The case is not the smallest and can create a bulge in your pocket
- Microphone sounds muffled
- These do not support multi-connect, meaning that these cannot connect to a phone and a tablet simultaneously
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Momentum 2's do not support multi-connect like the Jabra Elite 75T
- AirPods Pro's transparent hearing quality is better than Momentum 2's
- Sony's noise-cancelling has an edge over the Momentum True Wireless 2
- Galaxy Buds Plus have great clarity, but the bass isn't as good as the Momentum 2's
- The Momentum 2's sound better than AirPods
- Momentum 2 is more comfortable and nicer to use, battery life is better, and noise-cancelling is included
Takeaway: The Momentum True Wireless 2 earbuds offer respectable noise cancelation, sound good, and are sweat-resistant. These could be worth buying if sound is the main priority.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Good active noise cancelling, with added transparency mode
- Versatile app with a good amount of customization, featuring a three-band equalizer or a dynamic visualizer interface
- Respectable sound quality, with the ability to pick up on finer details going on in the background
- Good battery life, offering around six to seven hours of use from a single charge with ANC active
- Excellent pairing connectivity with Bluetooth 5.2
Product Considerations
- Bulky and boxy design
- Touch controls can be accidentally triggered
- Plasticky and boxy case, which is not the most comfortable to fit in a pocket
- ANC is not the most effective on the market in the low frequency range
- Microphone quality is okay, not good for recording podcasts
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- CX Plus is in the same price range as OnePlus Buds Pro and Beats Studio Buds
- Sony's ANC cancels more noise overall than CX Plus, but the Sennheiser has cleaner call quality in noisy places
- The CX Plus adds ANC compared to the Sennheiser CX True Wireless
- CX Plus offers better value than the Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 3, especially if top-tier ANC isn't a necessity
- CX Plus is a contender for Android users seeking an alternative to Apple AirPods Pro
Takeaway: The Sennheiser CX Plus True Wireless earbuds are a good choice if noise cancelling is desired in wireless earbuds, and good quality sound is sought. They have respectable audio quality with great ANC action, and fantastic battery life.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Fantastic sound quality, with 7mm dynamic drivers delivering rich, velvety, soft, dynamic, wide, clear, deep, and full sound
- Same drivers as the more expensive Momentum True Wireless 2.0
- Good passive noise cancellation due to a tight in-ear fit
- Customizable sound experience through the Sennheiser Smart Control app, which offers a graphic EQ
- Comprehensive touch controls, which can be customized via the app
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Good audio quality, with crisp and clear playback.
- Strong battery life, with around 9 hours on a single charge.
- Comprehensive and customizable touch controls via the Sennheiser Smart Control app.
- Secure fit in the ear, providing nice noise isolation due to the silicone tip design.
- Bluetooth 5.2 support with aptX codec, ensuring stable connection and good audio quality.
Product Considerations
- The buds are big and chunky, sticking out of the ears.
- Lack of active noise cancellation (ANC), a feature available in many competitors at the same or lower price point.
- Case is plastic and feels budget-y.
- Sub-bass presence can be somewhat subdued.
- Fit can loosen with intense exercise.
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs. Jabra Elite 75T: Jabra sounds more well-rounded, not as tinny.
- Vs. Oppo Enco X: Oppo Enco X offers fantastic ANC quality.
- Vs. Sennheiser CX400BT: The CX True Wireless has longer battery life.
- Vs. Apple AirPods Pro: AirPods Pro have a more comfortable fit and better noise cancelling.
- Vs Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus: Galaxy Buds Plus can connect to multiple devices.
Takeaway: The Sennheiser CX True Wireless earbuds are great for someone who wants solid audio and long-lasting battery life in their wireless earbuds. They are easy to control and offer a customizable sound experience for everyday use.
Video review
Our take on the brand
Our Summary
Product Strengths
- Heart rate and body temperature tracking, integrating with apps like Polar Flow for detailed data
- Good sound quality with a balanced soundstage and clear tones, suitable for various music genres
- A comfortable and secure fit with included ear tips and fins, making it suitable for sports and workouts
- The case has an IP54 rating, and the earbuds have an IP55 rating for moisture and dust resistance
- Capacitive touch controls and tap controls (tapping the cheekbone) provide control options, even with gloves or beanies
Product Considerations
- Some users experience discomfort with the wingtips after extended use
- The touch controls can be unresponsive or trigger accidentally, especially with long hair or when adjusting the fit
- The microphone's noise handling is mediocre, struggling to reject background noise during calls
- Continuous battery life is somewhat short at around 5.5 to 6 hours
- Some reviewers have experienced a clicking sound in the left earbud, which houses the heart rate sensor
Comparisons (according to reviewers)
- Vs Sennheiser Sport True Wireless: The Momentum Sport is a massive upgrade with additional features like heart rate and body temperature tracking, better transparency mode, and noise cancelling, but costs significantly more
- Vs Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Momentum Sport has biometric monitors, a more durable silicone case, and greater water and dust resistance, but the Momentum True Wireless 4 offers better noise cancelling and longer continuous battery life
Takeaway: The Momentum Sport is a feature-rich earbud with fitness tracking and good sound, making workouts more insightful and enjoyable. If someone wants an all-in-one device and does not mind some potential control quirks, it is a great pick.
Video review
Our take on the brand
How to buy
Headphones
Search all hifi products
Explore our database of 10,000+ new and 25,000+ used hifi products.














































.png)
.png)
.png)











